Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in karst areas from a geospatial perspective

被引:2
|
作者
Qu, Shaodong [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Yuan [1 ,3 ]
Gao, Jiangbo [1 ]
Cao, Qian [2 ]
Wang, Lunche [2 ]
Zhang, Yibo [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Fengxian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, 11A Datun Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Geog & Informat Engn, State Key Lab Biogeol & Environm Geol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecosystem services; geospatial perspective; human-nature interactions; karst; trade-offs and synergies; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTION; SOIL-EROSION; URBANIZATION; LAND;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.5145
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays, studies of ecosystem services (ESs) trade-offs and synergies in karst areas are limited to a single region. In particular, the quantification of the nature and intensity of the relationships between ESs in continuous karst distribution areas (CKDAs) and non-karst areas (NKAs), and a full understanding of the drivers behind this change remains a challenge. In this study, the province of Guizhou in China was used as study area and a framework was developed to analyze the spatial variation of trade-offs and synergies between ESs. The framework utilized Spearman, geographical detector, and multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to establish connections between four key ESs: habitat quality (HQ), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), and net primary productivity (NPP). Through the examination of these relationships, this article has revealed the influence of the driving forces on this ecological process. The study indicated that: (1) During this period, ESs in study area increased steadily, with the average value of HQ always above 0.6, and WY, SC, and NPP increased by 2.32%, 6.07%, and 15.18%, respectively. (2) WY had a trade-off relationship with other ESs, and SC, HQ, and NPP were synergistic with each other. (3) In the CKDA, topography and precipitation dominated the relationship between SC and other ESs. In contrast, in the NKA, ecological processes involving HQ were more prominent in human/natural interactions. Therefore, proposing ecological measures at different spatial scales to promote synergistic development between ESs is of great importance for ecological governance and sustainability of karst areas.
引用
收藏
页码:3448 / 3460
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial-Temporal Evolution, Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Qinba Mountains
    He, Xiaofeng
    Li, Wenqing
    Xu, Xingchao
    Zhao, Xueyan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [2] Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China
    Yang, Qiangqiang
    Zhang, Pian
    Qiu, Xiaocong
    Xu, Guanglai
    Chi, Jianyu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [3] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in karst multi-mountainous cities
    Li, Qin
    Bao, Yu
    Wang, Zhitai
    Chen, Xintong
    Lin, Xun
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [4] Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Ecosystem Services and Trade-Offs/Synergies in Wujiang River Basin, China
    Yang, Junyi
    Li, Junsheng
    Fu, Gang
    Liu, Bo
    Pan, Libo
    Hao, Haojing
    Guan, Xiao
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [5] Shifting from Trade-Offs to Synergies in Ecosystem Services Through Effective Ecosystem Management in Arid Areas
    Xu, Yan
    Song, Xiaoyun
    Deng, Mingjiang
    Bai, Tao
    Tao, Wanghai
    [J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [6] Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies
    Ament, Judith M.
    Moore, Christine A.
    Herbst, Marna
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 440 - 450
  • [7] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Southwestern China
    Ran, Chen
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Tan, Qiu
    Zhao, Cuiwei
    Luo, Xuling
    Chen, Huan
    Xi, Huipeng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (10) : 669 - 678
  • [8] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [9] Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas
    Aryal, Kishor
    Maraseni, Tek
    Apan, Armando
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59
  • [10] Land use trade-offs and synergies based on temporal and spatial patterns of ecosystem services in South China
    Shao, Yuting
    Xiao, Yi
    Sang, Weiguo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 143