A Charge Prediction Method Based on Graph Attention Network: CP-GAT

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao Q.-H. [1 ]
Li D.-P. [2 ]
Gao T.-H. [1 ]
Wen Y.-Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[2] School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[3] School of Computer Science and Engineering, Neusoft Research Institute, Northeastern University, Shenyang
关键词
Charge prediction; Graph attention network; Heterogeneous graph; Law article information; Node feature extraction;
D O I
10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.12.002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The task of charge prediction is to predict the charge of a case based on text data. Aiming at the problem that the existing methods do not perform well on similar charges and long tail datasets, a case charge prediction method was proposed based on graph attention network(CP-GAT). Firstly, the case event description text in the judicial document data set and the corresponding legal information of the case are used to establish the heterogeneous graph structure data. The constructed heterogeneous graph contains two types of nodes(word nodes and case nodes), two types of edges(the edges connected by word nodes and word nodes, the edges connected by word nodes and case nodes). The graph attention network was used to extract graph features on the heterogeneous graph constructed based on texts, and finally the obtained feature vector was input into the classifier of charge prediction to get the charge of the case. The experimental results on the CAIL2018 legal dataset show that the charge prediction method based on graph attention network is better than the model used in the comparative experiment, and the accuracy and macro F1 value reach 95.2% and 66.1 respectively, which verifies that the proposed method is conducive to improving the performance of the case charge prediction task. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Northeastern University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1681 / 1687
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Zhong H X, Xiao C J, Tu C C, Et al., How does NLP benefit legal system: a summary of legal artificial intelligence, Proceedings of the 58th Annal Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5218-5230, (2020)
  • [2] Li Qiang, Li Yao-kun, Xia Shu-yue, Et al., An improved medical text classification model: LS-GRU, Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 41, 7, pp. 938-943, (2020)
  • [3] Kort F., Predicting supreme court decisions mathematically: a quantitative analysis of the right to counsel cases, American Political Science Review, 51, 1, pp. 1-12, (1957)
  • [4] Nagel S S., Applying correlation analysis to case prediction, Texas Law Review, 42, 7, pp. 1006-1017, (1964)
  • [5] Liu C L, Hsieh C D., Exploring phrase-based classification of judicial documents for criminal charges in Chinese, Proceedings of International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 681-690, (2006)
  • [6] Liu Y H, Chen Y L, Ho W L., Predicting associated statutes for legal problems, Information Processing & Management, 51, 1, pp. 194-211, (2015)
  • [7] Katz D M, Nd B M, Blackman J., A general approach for predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the united states, Plos One, 12, 4, (2014)
  • [8] Luo B F, Feng Y S, Xu J B, Et al., Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis, Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2727-2736, (2017)
  • [9] Jiang X, Ye H, Luo Z C, Et al., Interpretable rationale augmented charge prediction system, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstration, pp. 146-151, (2018)
  • [10] Long S B, Tu C C, Liu Z Y, Et al., Automatic judgment prediction via legal reading comprehension