Blood test result communication in primary care: mixed-methods systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Nankervis, Helen [1 ]
Huntley, Alyson [1 ]
Whiting, Penny [1 ]
Hamilton, William [2 ]
Singh, Hardeep [3 ]
Dawson, Sarah [1 ]
Sprackman, Jane [1 ]
Montague, Anna Ferguson [1 ]
Watson, Jessica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter, England
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Blood tests; hematological tests; patient-centred care; patient satisfaction; communication; METHODOLOGICAL GUIDANCE; UK;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0105
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: After testing, ensuring test results are communicated and actioned is important for patient safety, with failure or delay in diagnosis the most common cause of malpractice claims in primary care worldwide. Identifying interventions to improve test communication from the decision to test through to sharing of results has important implications for patient safety, GP workload, and patient engagement. Aim: To assess the factors around communication of blood test results between primary care providers (for example GPs, nurses, reception staff) and their patients and carers. Design & setting: A mixed methods systematic review including primary studies involving communication of blood test results in primary care. Method: The review will use a segregated convergent synthesis method. Qualitative information will be synthesised using a meta-aggregative approach, and quantitative data will be meta-analysed or synthesised if pooling of studies is appropriate and data are available. If not, data will be presented in tabular and descriptive summary form. Conclusion: This review has the potential to provide conclusions about blood test result communication interventions and factors important to stakeholders, including barriers and facilitators to improved communication.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathways to diagnosis of a second primary cancer: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
    Kanguru, Lovney
    Bikker, Annemieke
    Cavers, Debbie
    Barnett, Karen
    Brewster, David H.
    Weller, David
    Campbell, Christine
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [2] Implementing post diagnostic dementia care in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Frost, Rachael
    Rait, Greta
    Aw, Su
    Brunskill, Greta
    Wilcock, Jane
    Robinson, Louise
    Knapp, Martin
    Hogan, Nicole
    Harrison Dening, Karen
    Allan, Louise
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Walters, Kate
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 25 (08) : 1381 - 1394
  • [3] Trauma-informed approaches to primary and community mental health care: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
    Dawson, Shoba
    Bierce, Angel
    Feder, Gene
    Macleod, John
    Turner, Katrina M.
    Zammit, Stan
    Lewis, Natalia, V
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [4] Factors Influencing Dementia Care Competence among Care Staff: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Protocol
    Zhu, Jinfeng
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhang, Xi
    Wu, Hui
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [5] Delivering safe and effective test-result communication, management and follow-up: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Dahm, Maria R.
    Georgiou, Andrew
    Westbrook, Johanna I.
    Greenfield, David
    Horvath, Andrea R.
    Wakefield, Denis
    Li, Ling
    Hillman, Ken
    Bolton, Patrick
    Brown, Anthony
    Jones, Graham
    Herkes, Robert
    Lindeman, Robert
    Legg, Michael
    Makeham, Meredith
    Moses, Daniel
    Badmus, Dauda
    Campbell, Craig
    Hardie, Rae-Anne
    Li, Julie
    McCaughey, Euan
    Sezgin, Gorkem
    Thomas, Judith
    Wabe, Nasir
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [6] Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Laginha, Bela Ines
    Rapport, Frances
    Smith, Andrea
    Wilkinson, David
    Cust, Anne E.
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [7] The awareness of women on prostate cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Ebenezer Wiafe
    Kofi Boamah Mensah
    Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah
    Varsha Bangalee
    Frasia Oosthuizen
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [8] The awareness of women on prostate cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Wiafe, Ebenezer
    Mensah, Kofi Boamah
    Mensah, Adwoa Bemah Boamah
    Bangalee, Varsha
    Oosthuizen, Frasia
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [9] Facilitators of and barriers to continuity with GPs in primary palliative cancer care: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Couchman, Emilie
    Ejegi-Memeh, Steph
    Mitchell, Sarah
    Gardiner, Clare
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 31 (01) : 18 - 36
  • [10] End-of-life care preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review
    Isabel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ana
    Schmucker, Christine
    Nothacker, Julia
    Nguyen, Truc Sophia
    Brueckle, Maria-Sophie
    Blom, Jeanet
    van den Akker, Marjan
    Roettger, Kristian
    Wegwarth, Odette
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Muth, Christiane
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07): : e038682