Differential game guidance law design for integration of penetration and strike of multiple flight vehicles

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Tao [1 ]
Zhou, Hao [1 ]
Dong, Xiaofei [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Wanchun [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing,100083, China
[2] Science and Technology on Complex System Control and Intelligent Agent Cooperation Laboratory, Beijing,100074, China
[3] School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing,100083, China
关键词
Active defense - Condition - Design for integrations - Differential games - Flight vehicles - Guidance laws - Law design - Miss-distance - Offensive and defensive confrontation - Optimal maneuver;
D O I
10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0673
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To solve the problem of dodging the defense missile group and hitting the target, a differential game guidance law which can be applied under the condition of incomplete enemy information is proposed. The linearized model of multi-vehicle engagement was established and the order of the model was reduced according to different combat teams. A time operator is introduced to unify the terminal time of all teams, and thus the guidance law was deducted based on two-person zero-sum differential game theory. The state estimation of interceptors and target was applied to the proposed guidance law by employing the extended Kalman filter (EKF). The penetration miss distance is greater than 5 m assuming complete hostile state information, and the interception miss distance is less than 0.1 m. Given only the rough and noisy observations, to be a contrast, the state estimation error of interceptors and target is well acceptable, and similar miss distance accuracy can be achieved. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed guidance law can effectively guide attacking missiles to evade interception and hit the target accurately. © 2022, Editorial Board of JBUAA. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:898 / 909
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design and Numerical Simulation of a Differential Game Guidance Law
    Xu, Xingyuan
    Cai, Yuanli
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND AUTOMATION (ICIA), 2016, : 314 - 318
  • [2] Adaptive Cooperative Game Penetration Guidance for Multiple Hypersonic Vehicles With Performance Constraints
    Chen, Jieqing
    Sun, Ruisheng
    Lu, Yu
    Zhao, Ri
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2024, 60 (04) : 5538 - 5555
  • [3] Cooperative game penetration guidance for multiple hypersonic vehicles under safety critical framework
    Chen, Jieqing
    Sun, Ruisheng
    Lu, Yu
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2024, 37 (01) : 247 - 255
  • [4] Cooperative game penetration guidance for multiple hypersonic vehicles under safety critical framework
    Jieqing CHEN
    Ruisheng SUN
    Yu LU
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37 (01) : 247 - 255
  • [5] Optimal guidance law with multiple constraints in ground strike
    Sun, Wei-Meng
    Zheng, Zhi-Qiang
    [J]. Binggong Xuebao/Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29 (05): : 567 - 571
  • [6] Minimum-Effort Waypoint-Following Differential Geometric Guidance Law Design for Endo-Atmospheric Flight Vehicles
    Qin, Xuesheng
    Li, Kebo
    Liang, Yangang
    Liu, Yuanhe
    [J]. DRONES, 2023, 7 (06)
  • [7] An Adaptive Weighted Differential Game Guidance Law
    ZHANG Ping FANG Yangwang ZHANG Fengming XIAO Bingsong HU Shiguo ZONG Shuning College of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering Air Force Engineering University Xian China
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25 (05) - 746
  • [8] An Adaptive Weighted Differential Game Guidance Law
    ZHANG Ping
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, (05) : 739 - 746
  • [9] An Adaptive Weighted Differential Game Guidance Law
    Zhang Ping
    Fang Yangwang
    Zhang Fengming
    Xiao Bingsong
    Hu Shiguo
    Zong Shuning
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2012, 25 (05) : 739 - 746
  • [10] Optimal Design of Cooperative Guidance Law for Simultaneous Strike
    Daughtery, Edward
    Qu, Zhihua
    [J]. 2014 IEEE 53RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2014, : 988 - 993