Comparison of Windup and Stretch Pitching Biomechanics in Baseball With Implications for Safety and Performance

被引:0
|
作者
Fleisig, Glenn S. [1 ]
Slowik, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Kutz, Charles B. [2 ]
Escamilla, Rafael F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Sports Med Inst, 833 St Vincents Dr, Suite 101, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA
[2] Middlebury Coll, Middlebury, VT USA
[3] Calif State Univ, Sacramento, CA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2024年 / 52卷 / 07期
关键词
fastball velocity; elbow; shoulder; injury; kinematics; kinetics; timing; FASTBALL;
D O I
10.1177/03635465241247543
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Historically, it was assumed by some that high leg lift with windup pitching generated more ball velocity whereas pitching from the stretch was quicker to reduce the risk of base stealing but also more stressful on the arm. However, many now believe that velocity and stress do not differ between windup and stretch and always pitching from the stretch is simpler than mastering 2 techniques. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare windup and stretch fastball pitching biomechanics. It was hypothesized that there would be statistically significant and clinically important differences in ball velocity, timing of angular velocities, joint kinetics, and pitching kinematics. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fastball pitching biomechanics previously captured for 221 healthy baseball pitchers (105 professional, 52 collegiate, and 64 high school level) were analyzed. For each pitcher, data for 3 to 10 windup trials and 3 to 10 stretch trials were available. Ball velocity was recorded using a radar gun. A 12-camera, 240-Hz automated motion capture system was used to track 39 reflective markers attached to the pitcher. A total of 24 kinematic parameters, 4 temporal parameters, and 5 kinetic parameters were calculated. Data for each parameter were compared across the 2 techniques and 3 competition levels using 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P < .01). Based on previous studies and the expertise of the investigators, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was set as 2 degrees for angle measurements, 20 deg/s for angular velocities, 0.5 m/s for fastball velocity, and 0.3% body height x weight for normalized joint torque. Results: Fastball velocity was statistically greater from the windup than stretch for the collegiate subgroup but not for the other 2 levels. The collegiate level difference was below the MCID. Pitching from the windup generated greater front knee height and required more time from initiation of leg lift to front foot contact. From foot contact to ball release, there were 11 additional small, statistically significant differences between windup and stretch; however, each of these was well below the MCID. Conclusion: Pitching from the stretch was quicker and should be used with runners on base to prevent stealing. Pitching from the windup and stretch produced similar ball velocity, joint kinetics, and kinematics. Thus, pitchers may choose to use both techniques or stretch only based on comfort and personal preference. Clinical Relevance: The decision to pitch from both the windup and stretch or only from the stretch should not affect a pitcher's performance or joint stress (and injury risk).
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1675
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Baseball Pitching Biomechanics in Relation to Injury Risk and Performance
    Fortenbaugh, Dave
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    Andrews, James R.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2009, 1 (04): : 314 - 320
  • [2] Changes in Youth Baseball Pitching Biomechanics
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    Diffendaffer, Alek Z.
    Ivey, Brett
    Aune, Kyle T.
    Laughlin, Tony
    Fortenbaugh, Dave
    Bolt, Becky
    Lucas, Wendy
    Moore, Kevin D.
    Dugas, Jeffrey R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01): : 44 - 51
  • [3] BIOMECHANICS OF THE ELBOW DURING BASEBALL PITCHING
    WERNER, SL
    FLEISIG, GS
    DILLMAN, CJ
    ANDREWS, JR
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 17 (06): : 274 - 278
  • [4] The Clinician's Guide to Baseball Pitching Biomechanics
    Diffendaffer, Alek Z.
    Bagwell, Michael S.
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    Yanagita, Yuki
    Stewart, Megan
    Cain, E. Lyle
    Dugas, Jeffrey R.
    Wilk, Kevin E.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (02): : 274 - 281
  • [5] BIOMECHANICS OF BASEBALL PITCHING - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT
    PAPPAS, AM
    ZAWACKI, RM
    SULLIVAN, TJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (04): : 216 - 222
  • [6] Hip Flexibility and Pitching Biomechanics in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers
    Albiero, Maxwell L.
    Kokott, Wesley
    Dziuk, Cody
    Cross, Janelle A.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2022, 57 (07) : 704 - 710
  • [7] The influence of mound height on baseball movement and pitching biomechanics
    Diffendaffer, Alek Z.
    Slowik, Jonathan S.
    Lo, Nicholas J.
    Drogosz, Monika
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2019, 22 (07) : 858 - 861
  • [8] Hip Strength and Pitching Biomechanics in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers
    Albiero, Maxwell L.
    Kokott, Wesley
    Dziuk, Cody
    Cross, Janelle A.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2023, 58 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [9] Do Mound Height and Pitching Distance Affect Youth Baseball Pitching Biomechanics?
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    Diffendaffer, Alek Z.
    Ivey, Brett
    Oi, Takanori
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (12): : 2996 - 3001
  • [10] Glenohumeral Rotational Motion and Strength and Baseball Pitching Biomechanics
    Hurd, Wendy J.
    Kaufman, Kenton R.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2012, 47 (03) : 247 - 256