Center pivot irrigation capacity effects on maize yield and profitability in the Texas High Plains

被引:9
|
作者
Domínguez A. [1 ]
Schwartz R.C. [2 ]
Pardo J.J. [1 ]
Guerrero B. [3 ]
Bell J.M. [4 ]
Colaizzi P.D. [2 ]
Louis Baumhardt R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos y de Montes (ETSIAM), Centro Regional de Estudios del Agua (CREA), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Ctra. de Las Peñas, km 3.2, Albacete
[2] USDA-ARS, PO Drawer 10, Bushland, 79012, TX
[3] Dept. of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, 79016, TX
[4] Texas A&M AgriLife Research & Extension, 6500 Amarillo Blvd W Amarillo, 79106, TX
关键词
Limited irrigation; MOPECO; Sprinkler irrigation; Typical meteorological year; Water productivity; Zea mays L;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107335
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the Texas High Plains (THP), groundwater resources for irrigation are declining because of aquifer depletion and reduced well yield. Inability to meet peak water demands of maize under constrained irrigation capacities decreases yield and profitability. The MOPECO crop model, calibrated for the THP, was adapted to simulate maize water use and yield under center pivot irrigation to evaluate water allocation strategies under limited irrigation. Simulations were carried out over a range of irrigation capacities (3 – 12 mm d-1 for a 50.9 ha area), initial soil water contents, and application depths with irrigation allocated to a fraction (0.5 – 1.0) of the pivot area. Fractional water allocations were achieved by withholding irrigation from circular sectors or from outer spans with unirrigated fractions in fallow or planted to dryland cotton. These strategies were evaluated for growing seasons characterized by typical meteorological years with average (TMY1), average to above average (TMY2), and below average (TMY3) precipitation. Preseason irrigation had little to no influence on grain yield at irrigation capacities ≥ 5 mm d-1. At irrigation capacities ≤6 mm d-1 under TMY1, marginally greater yields 50.9 ha-1 were simulated when a fraction was irrigated. For irrigation capacities ≤8 mm d-1 under TMY1, reducing the irrigated area was the most prudent option to optimize net returns. As irrigation capacities increased from 4 to 8 mm d-1, the irrigated fraction that maximized net returns increased from 0.5 to 0.9. Concentrating water generated greater net returns because of greater irrigation water productivities and lower seed and fertilizer costs. Compared with fallow, planting cotton in the unirrigated portion increased net returns except in years with a seasonal drought (TMY3). Because greater irrigation volume did not always increase net returns, there is an opportunity to both increase profitability and conserve water by irrigating a fraction of the area. © 2021
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Irrigation Management Effects on Crop Water Productivity for Maize Production in the Texas High Plains
    Marek, Gary W.
    Marek, Thomas H.
    Evett, Steven R.
    Chen, Yong
    Heflin, Kevin R.
    Moorhead, Jerry E.
    Brauer, David K.
    [J]. WATER CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 6 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [2] Irrigation Management Effects on Crop Water Productivity for Maize Production in the Texas High Plains
    Gary W. Marek
    Thomas H. Marek
    Steven R. Evett
    Yong Chen
    Kevin R. Heflin
    Jerry E. Moorhead
    David K. Brauer
    [J]. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 2021, 6 : 37 - 43
  • [3] TILLAGE AND CROPPING SYSTEM EFFECTS ON COTTON YIELD AND PROFITABILITY ON THE TEXAS SOUTHERN HIGH-PLAINS
    SEGARRA, E
    KEELING, JW
    ABERNATHY, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (04): : 566 - 571
  • [4] Optimal Field Partitioning for Center-Pivot-Irrigated Cotton in the Texas High Plains
    Nair, Shyam
    Maas, Stephan
    Wang, Chenggang
    Mauget, Steven
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 105 (01) : 124 - 133
  • [5] BARLEY YIELD RESPONSE TO IRRIGATION AND POTENTIAL PROFITS IN THE TEXAS HIGH-PLAINS
    HARMAN, WL
    REGIER, C
    LANSFORD, VD
    PETR, F
    MAREK, TH
    [J]. IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 1990, 11 (03) : 163 - 172
  • [6] EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION AMOUNT ON ALFALFA YIELD AND QUALITY WITH A CENTER-PIVOT SYSTEM
    Li, M.
    Liu, Y.
    Yan, H.
    Sui, R.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2017, 60 (05) : 1633 - 1644
  • [7] TILLAGE AND LOW-PRESSURE CENTER-PIVOT IRRIGATION EFFECTS ON CORN YIELD
    WILHELM, WW
    MIELKE, LN
    GILLEY, JR
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1985, 77 (02) : 258 - 263
  • [8] Drip Irrigation Improves Vegetable Crop Yield and Water Use Efficiency on the Texas High Plains
    Rho, Hyungmin
    Xue, Qingwu
    Rush, Charlie
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S256 - S257
  • [9] Irrigation and nitrogen effects on tall wheatgrass yield in the Southern High Plains
    Lauriault, LM
    Kirksey, RE
    Donart, GB
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (04) : 792 - 797
  • [10] Center pivot irrigation management in maize hybrids and the incidence of stalk rot
    Kuhn, Irineu E.
    Cotrim, Mayara F.
    Gava, Ricardo
    Alvarez, Rita de C. F.
    de Oliveira, Job T.
    Teodoro, Paulo E.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2020, 24 (12): : 840 - 846