The four stages of neighborhood trust: Classic grounded theory

被引:0
|
作者
Beese, Shawna [1 ,2 ]
Graves, Janessa M. [1 ,3 ]
Postma, Julie [1 ]
Oneal, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Coll Agr Human & Nat Resource Sci Extens, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Coll Nursing, Spokane, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
grounded theory; health promotion; neighborhood characteristics; public health nursing; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/phn.13326
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionNeighborhoods are often overlooked as a determinant of health. Among recent research, the focus on "place-based effects," due to prolonged residential environmental exposure, has been of particular interest. These studies' purpose is to identify and examine how a healthy neighborhood is intentionally created to describe a transferable process-driven theory.MethodA classic grounded theory approach was used in these studies. Data sources include individual in-depth interviews, historical documents, and a member-checking focus group, collected over 3-years.ResultsAnalysis generated the Four Stages of Neighborhood Trust Model, which is nested within the context of perceived neighborhood safety. The theory outlines a social process of four stages of neighborhood trust: (a) rules-based agreements, (b) shared values, (c) cooperation, and (d) neighborhood belonging.ConclusionsWe present the development of a process-driven theory that may be useful for public health nurses as they engage neighborhoods in health promotion activities. The stage of trust development will aid the nurse in identifying what is needed to move to the next stage in a healthy neighborhood process.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 780
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classic Grounded Theory-The Latest Version: Interpretation of Classic Grounded Theory as a Meta-Theory for Research
    Konecki, Krzysztof T.
    [J]. SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 2018, 41 (04) : 547 - 564
  • [2] The grounded theory of "trust building"
    Ramezani, Monir
    Ahmadi, Fazlollah
    Mohammadi, Eesa
    Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2019, 26 (03) : 753 - 766
  • [3] Protecting Personhood: A Classic Grounded Theory
    Didier, Amelia
    Nathaniel, Alvita
    Scott, Helen
    Look, Susanne
    Benaroyo, Lazare
    Zumstein-Shaha, Maya
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (13) : 1177 - 1188
  • [4] Choosing Classic Grounded Theory: A Grounded Theory Reader of Expert Advice.
    Evans, Gary
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2015, 14 (01): : 61 - 63
  • [5] Evolating: A Classic Grounded Theory of Personal Transformation
    Wright, Judith
    Wright, Robert
    Medlock, Gordon
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2021, 20 (02): : 59 - 79
  • [6] Building a Classic Grounded Theory: Some Reflections
    Yarwood-Ross, Lee
    Jack, Kirsten
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2023, 22 (01): : 49 - 65
  • [7] Grounded Leadership, Emergence Coaching, & Classic Grounded Theory: An Action Research Study
    Wright, Robert
    Wright, Judith
    Medlock, Gordon
    Zwell, Mike
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2022, 21 (01): : 92 - 114
  • [8] A Critique of Four Grounded Theory Texts
    Allen, Lise M.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2010, 15 (06) : 1606 - 1620
  • [9] UNDERSTANDING CLASSIC, STRAUSSIAN, AND CONSTRUCTIVIST GROUNDED THEORY APPROACHES
    Rakhmawati, Windy
    [J]. BELITUNG NURSING JOURNAL, 2019, 5 (03) : 111 - 115
  • [10] Opportunizing: A classic grounded theory study on business and management
    Christiansen, Olavur
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2006, 6 (01): : 109 - 133