Improving pixel-based regional landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:10
|
作者
Wei, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gardoni, Paolo [4 ]
Zhang, Lulu [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Tan, Lin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Dongsheng [5 ]
Du, Chunlan [6 ]
Li, Hai [6 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Civil Engn, State Key Lab Ocean Engn, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Adv Ship & Deep Sea Explora, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Key Lab Digital Maintenance Bldg & Infras, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Illinois, MAE Ctr Creating Multihazard Approach Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 205 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Chongqing Bur Geol & Minerals Explorat, Chongqing 401121, Peoples R China
[6] Chongqing Reconnaissance & Design Acad Geol Disast, Chongqing Bur Geol & Minerals Explorat, Hydrogeol & Engn Team 208, Chongqing 400700, Peoples R China
[7] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Room A405,Mulan Bldg,800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility mapping; Logistic regression; Convolutional neural network; Hybrid model; Interpretability; Cross -regional generalization; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; STABILITY ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY RATIO; LAND-USE; SLOPE; MODELS; CALIBRATION; PREDICTION; INVENTORY; ZONATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101782
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Regional landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is essential for risk mitigation. While deep learning algorithms are increasingly used in LSM, their extensive parameters and scarce labels (limited landslide records) pose training challenges. In contrast, classical statistical algorithms, with typically fewer parameters, are less likely to overfit, easier to train, and offer greater interpretability. Additionally, integrating physics -based and data -driven approaches can potentially improve LSM. This paper makes several contributions to enhance the practicality, interpretability, and cross -regional generalization ability of regional LSM models: (1) Two new hybrid models, composed of data -driven and physics -based modules, are proposed and compared. Hybrid Model I combines the infinite slope stability analysis (ISSA) with logistic regression, a classical statistical algorithm. Hybrid Model II integrates ISSA with a convolutional neural network, a representative of deep learning techniques. The physics -based module constructs a new explanatory factor with higher nonlinearity and reduces prediction uncertainty caused by incomplete landslide inventory by pre -selecting non -landslide samples. The data -driven module captures the relation between explanatory factors and landslide inventory. (2) A step -wise deletion process is proposed to assess the importance of explanatory factors and identify the minimum necessary factors required to maintain satisfactory model performance. (3) Single -pixel and local -area samples are compared to understand the effect of pixel spatial neighborhood. (4) The impact of nonlinearity in data -driven algorithms on hybrid model performance is explored. Typical landslide -prone regions in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, are used as the study area. The results show that, in the testing region, by using local -area samples to account for pixel spatial neighborhoods, Hybrid Model I achieves roughly a 4.2% increase in the AUC. Furthermore, models with 30 m resolution land -cover data surpass those using 1000 m resolution data, showing a 5.5% improvement in AUC. The optimal set of explanatory factors includes elevation, land -cover type, and safety factor. These findings reveal the key elements to enhance regional LSM, offering valuable insights for LSM practices. (c) 2023 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Geosciences (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional susceptibility assessments with heterogeneous landslide information: Slope unit- vs. pixel-based approach
    Jacobs, Liesbet
    Kervyn, Matthieu
    Reichenbach, Paola
    Rossi, Mauro
    Marchesini, Ivan
    Alvioli, Massimiliano
    Dewitte, Olivier
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2020, 356
  • [2] The Prediction of Cross-Regional Landslide Susceptibility Based on Pixel Transfer Learning
    Wang, Xiao
    Wang, Di
    Li, Xinyue
    Zhang, Mengmeng
    Cheng, Sizhi
    Li, Shaoda
    Dong, Jianhui
    Xu, Luting
    Sun, Tiegang
    Li, Weile
    Ran, Peilian
    Liu, Liang
    Wang, Baojie
    Zhao, Ling
    Huang, Xinyi
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [3] Mapping land subsidence susceptibility due to groundwater decline using fuzzy pixel-based models
    Mehdi Aalipour
    Bahram Malekmohammadi
    Zahra Ghorbani
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [4] Pixel-based image fusion with false color mapping
    Zhao, W
    Mao, SY
    [J]. IMAGE PROCESSING AND PATTERN RECOGNITION IN REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 4898 : 140 - 149
  • [5] Regional Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Grey Relational Degree Model
    Huang F.
    Wang Y.
    Dong Z.
    Wu L.
    Guo Z.
    Zhang T.
    [J]. Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2019, 44 (02): : 664 - 676
  • [6] Improving Database Security with Pixel-based Granular Encryption
    Aydogan, Ahmet Furkan
    Zhou, Bing
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 2591 - 2596
  • [7] Improving Spatial Agreement in Machine Learning-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani
    Rahman, Md Salman
    Ahmed, Nahian
    Ahmed, Bayes
    Rabbi, Md. Fazleh
    Rahman, Rashedur M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 23
  • [8] Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas
    Whiteside, Timothy G.
    Boggs, Guy S.
    Maier, Stefan W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2011, 13 (06) : 884 - 893
  • [9] Comparison and validation of per-pixel and object-based approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Nachappa, Thimmaiah Gudiyangada
    Kienberger, Stefan
    Meena, Sansar Raj
    Hoelbling, Daniel
    Blaschke, Thomas
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2020, 11 (01) : 572 - 600
  • [10] Improving Pixel-based MIM by Reducing Wasted Modeling Capability
    Liu, Yuan
    Zhang, Songyang
    Chen, Jiacheng
    Yu, Zhaohui
    Chen, Kai
    Lin, Dahua
    [J]. 2023 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, ICCV, 2023, : 5338 - 5349