Intrapartum PCR-assay for detection of Group B Streptococci (GBS)

被引:11
|
作者
Helmig, Rikke B. [1 ,3 ]
Gertsen, Jan B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Skejby, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Skejby, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palle Juhl Jensen Blvd 99, DK-8200 Skejby, Denmark
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X | 2019年 / 4卷
关键词
Early-onset GBS disease; Group B streptococcus; Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis; PCR-assay for GBS; PROM; Intrapartum PCR-assay for detection of GBS; COLONIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100081
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We have recently introduced intrapartum PCR-testing for group B streptococcus (GBS) in women in labor with prolonged rupture of membranes or preterm delivery to offer intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis only for GBS positive women. The goal of the present study is to report our experience and results from the first half year of GBS testing. Study design: This is a retrospective study. Rectovaginal swabs from 321 women presenting in the labor ward with pre-labor rupture of membranes for >14 h/rupture of membranes during delivery for >14 h, or labor between gestational weeks 35 0/7 and 36 6/7 from February 7, 2017 to August 6, 2017, were tested. We performed a molecular GBS test (Xpert GBS1, Cepheid Ltd., Sunnyvale, USA). Data from patient files including mode of delivery, use of antibiotics, infection of mother and child are presented in more detail. Data on the PCR results from the first year of testing were also collected. Results: In the first half-year of testing a positive GBS test result was found in 58 (18.1%) and a negative test result in 263 women (81.9%). No invalid test result was achieved. The indication for performing PCR testing was PROM > 14 h or rupture of membranes during labor for >14 h in 266 women (82.9%) and labor in gestational weeks 35 0/7-36 6/7 in 44 women (13.7%). In the remaining 11 women, the PCR test was performed for other reasons. Of the 321 women tested 126 (39%) received antibiotics during labor. Ten women (3.4%) were treated after delivery on suspicion of infection. 25 newborns (7.8%) were treated with antibiotics. In 11 cases, the treatment was stopped after 2-4 days as there were no signs of infection. Conclusions: The introduction of the intrapartum GBS test in selected groups of women who gave birth in our department has been well accepted by the women, the midwifes and doctors. The result of the test is available within two hours, and as we only offer intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-positive women, we have reduced the use of antibiotics to approximately 40% in the groups tested, without an increase of infection in mother or child. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of BD MAX GBS and GenomEra GBS assays for rapid intrapartum PCR detection of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci
    Andreasen, Trine
    Moller, Jens Kjolseth
    Khalil, Mohammed Rohi
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [2] Evaluation of intrapartum rapid detection of group B streptococci (GBS) tests in women with GBS bacteriuria during pregnancy
    Hartmeyer, Gitte Nyvang
    Redin, Anna Kjaer
    Kristensen, Emma Krusborg
    Skov, Marianne Nielsine
    Vinter, Christina Anne
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 : 29 - 29
  • [3] Intrapartum detection of Group B streptococci colonization by rapid PCR-test on labor ward
    Mueller, Martin
    Henle, Ariane
    Droz, Sara
    Kind, Andre B.
    Rohner, Susanne
    Baumann, Marc
    Surbek, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 176 : 137 - 141
  • [4] Fungal PCR-assay for the detection of invasive aspergillosis
    Rimek, D
    Garg, AP
    Kappe, R
    Sonntag, HG
    MYCOSES, 1998, 41 : 65 - 68
  • [5] Evaluation of the Revogene® GBS DS assay performance for the intrapartum screening of group B streptococcus in comparison with intrapartum culture
    Meex, Cecile
    Devey, Anais
    Defeche, Justine
    Bontems, Sebastien
    Descy, Julie
    Hayette, Marie-Pierre
    Sacheli, Rosalie
    Melin, Pierrette
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 102 (03)
  • [6] Intrapartum PCR assay versus antepartum culture for assessment of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci in a Danish cohort at birth
    Khalil, Mohammed Rohi
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    Thorsen, Poul Bak
    Moller, Jens Kjolseth
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [7] Intrapartum PCR assay is a fast and efficient screening method for Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnancy
    Zietek, Maciej
    Jaroszewicz-Trzaska, Joanna
    Szczuko, Malgorzata
    Mantiuk, Radoslaw
    Celewicz, Zbigniew
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 91 (09) : 549 - 553
  • [8] Intrapartum Group B streptococci detection by rapid polymerase chain reaction assay allows for the prevention of neonatal sepsis
    de Tejada, Begona Martinez
    Schrenzel, Jacques
    Pfister, Riccardo E.
    Renzi, Gesuele
    Francois, Patrice
    Irion, Olivier
    Boulvain, Michel
    ADVANCES IN PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, : 391 - +
  • [9] Detection of group B streptococci (GBS) in vaginal swabs using real-time PCR with TaqMan probe hybridization
    Bergh, K
    Stoelhaug, A
    Loeseth, K
    Bevanger, L
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 119 : 221 - 223
  • [10] Evaluation of real-time fluorescent PCR assay for rapid detection of Group B streptococci
    Golden, SM
    Faux, BM
    Smith, JW
    Johnson, OL
    dela Cruz, WP
    Shoemaker, C
    Stamilio, DM
    Clark, VM
    Blackmon, CL
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 395A - 395A