Development and validation of a universal esophageal patient-reported outcome measure: The Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ)

被引:2
|
作者
Sudarshan, Monisha [1 ,4 ]
Tasnim, Sadia [1 ]
Ramji, Sadhvika [1 ]
Rappaport, Jesse [1 ]
Barron, John O. [1 ]
Bribriesco, Alejandro C. [1 ]
Schraufnagel, Dean P. [1 ]
Lapin, Brittany [2 ,3 ]
Li, Yadi [2 ,3 ]
Raymond, Daniel P. [1 ]
Blackstone, Eugene H. [1 ]
Murthy, Sudish C. [1 ]
Raja, Siva [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Lerner Res Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Neurol Inst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Thorac Surg, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
关键词
quality of life; esophageal diseases; validation; symptoms scale; achalasia; hiatal hernia; esophageal cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Currently, there is no validated patient -reported outcome measure (PROM) applicable to all esophageal diseases. Our objective was to create a psychometrically robust, validated universal esophageal PROM that can also objectively assess patients' quality of life (QoL). Methods: The pilot PROM constructed based on expert opinions, literature review, and previous unpublished institutional research had 27 items covering 8 domains. It was completed by 30 patients in the outpatient clinic followed by a structured debriefing interview, which allowed for refining the PROM. The final PROM: Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ) included 34 items across 6 domains (Dysphagia, Eating, Pain, Reflux & Regurgitation, Dyspepsia, Dumping), each accompanied by a corresponding QoL component. Further psychometric assessment of the PROM was conducted by evaluating (1) acceptability, (2) construct validity, (3) reliability, and (4) responsiveness. Results: Five hundred forty-six unique patients (median 63.7 years [54.3-71.7], 53% male [287], 86% White) completed CEQ at >90% completion within 5 minutes. Construct validity was demonstrated by differentiating scores across esophageal cancer (n =146), achalasia (n =170), hiatal hernia (n =160), and other diagnoses (n = 70). Internal reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.83-0.89), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.63-0.85) were strong. Responsiveness was demonstrated through CEQ domains improving for 53 patients who underwent surgery for achalasia or hiatal hernia (Cohen d 0.86-2.59). Conclusions: We have constructed a psychometrically robust, universal esophageal PROM that allows concise, consistent, objective quantification of symptoms and their effect on the patient. The CEQ is valuable in prognostication and tracking of longitudinal outcomes in both benign and malignant esophageal diseases. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024;167:1490-7)
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discussion to: Development and validation of a universal esophageal patient-reported outcome measure: The Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ)
    Sudarshan, Monisha
    Worrell, Stephanie G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (04): : 1498 - 1499
  • [2] Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia
    Schmahmann, Jeremy D.
    Pierce, Samantha
    MacMore, Jason
    L'Italien, Gilbert J.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2021, 36 (10) : 2367 - 2377
  • [3] Commentary: A universal patient-reported outcome measure
    Conrad, Hope
    Worrell, Stephanie G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (04): : 1500 - 1501
  • [4] Development, validation and interpretation of the PROMIS Itch Questionnaire: a patient-reported outcome measure for the burden of itch
    Silverberg, J.
    Lai, J.
    Cella, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 139 (05) : S105 - S105
  • [5] Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
    Luo, Yanhong
    Yang, Jie
    Zhang, Yanbo
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [6] Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
    Yanhong Luo
    Jie Yang
    Yanbo Zhang
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13
  • [7] Patient-reported impact of scars measure (PRISM): development and validation of a new skin scar patient-reported outcome measure
    Brown, B. C.
    McKenna, S. P.
    Solomon, M.
    Wilburn, J.
    McGrouther, D. A.
    Bayat, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 161 : 17 - 17
  • [8] Development and Preliminary Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation Questionnaire: A Prospective Cohort Study
    England, Ryan W.
    Motaghi, Mina
    Kohler, Beatriz
    Hemmingson, Thomas E.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Weiss, Clifford R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (05) : 683 - +
  • [9] Development and preliminary validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for swallowing after total laryngectomy (SOAL questionnaire)
    Govender, R.
    Lee, M. T.
    Davies, T. C.
    Twinn, C. E.
    Katsoulis, K. L.
    Payten, C. L.
    Stephens, R.
    Drinnan, M.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 37 (06) : 452 - 459
  • [10] Development and Validation of an Eating Behavior Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Obesity
    Bushnell, Donald
    Brod, Meryl
    Roberts, Carl
    Hennige, Anita
    Ustyugova, Anastasia
    [J]. OBESITY, 2023, 31 : 54 - 54