THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHOCK SEPARATED FLOW CORRECTIONS OF k-ω SST MODEL

被引:0
|
作者
Du Y. [1 ]
Gao Z. [2 ]
Shu B. [2 ]
Qiu F. [1 ]
Song C. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Aerospace Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang
[2] School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an
[3] AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute, Shenyang
关键词
Bradshaw assumption; k-ω SST model; Reynolds stress; shock separated flow; turbulence length scale; turbulence model correction;
D O I
10.6052/0459-1879-22-065
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Shock/boundary-layer separation is a typical turbulence non-equilibrium flow in the field of aeronautical aerodynamics. Accurate simulation of shock separated flow is of great significance for aerodynamic performance evaluation and optimization of transonic aircraft. The definition of eddy viscosity coefficient in conventional eddy-viscosity turbulence models (EVM), however, is not suitable for non-equilibrium flow. The Bradshaw assumption introduced by k-ω SST turbulence model for this purpose instead restricts the generation of Reynolds stress when applied to three-dimensional flow with strong adverse pressure gradient and large separation, which results in the invalidity of k-ω SST model as well as other commonly used EVMs for this kind of flow. Moreover, the existing nonlinear constitutive relation of Reynolds stress cannot effectively improve the simulation accuracy. To this end, two shock separated flow correction methods respectively based on Bradshaw assumption and length scale are proposed for k-ω SST model. The former correction relaxes the limitation of Reynolds stress generation by increasing Bradshaw constant. While based on the concept of turbulence length scale, the latter correction constructs a modified function for the dissipation term of the ω equation by using the mixing length theory, the generation-dissipation ratio of turbulent kinetic energy and a newly defined ratio of length scale to improve the modeling length scale in three-dimensional shock separated flow. The two methods both get better simulation results for the transonic flow of ONERA M6 wing at high angle of attack than those of Reynolds stress model. Further Reynolds stress analysis reveals that the concept of "major Reynolds-stress component" in three-dimensional shock separated flow is no longer tenable since the magnitude of each Reynolds-stress component is close. The grid convergence analysis, and verifications on other angles of attack and the wall-function law of turbulent boundary layer on the flat plate further confirm the validity, applicability and universality of the proposed correction methods. © 2022 Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1485 / 1501
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Wilcox DC., Turbulence Modeling of CFD, (2006)
  • [2] Rumsey CL, Ying SX., Prediction of high lift: review of present CFD capability, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38, 2, pp. 145-180, (2002)
  • [3] Slotnick J, Khodadoust A, Alonso J, Et al., CFD vision 2030 study: a path to revolutionary computational aerosciences
  • [4] Yan Chao, Qu Feng, Zhao Yatian, Et al., Review of development and challenges for physical modeling and numerical scheme of CFD in aeronautics and astronautics, Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 38, 5, pp. 829-857, (2020)
  • [5] Kato M, Launder BE., The modelling of turbulent flow around stationary and vibrating square cylinders, 9th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, (1993)
  • [6] Townsend AA., Equilibrium layers and wall turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 11, 1, pp. 97-120, (1961)
  • [7] Prandtl L., Bericht über untersuchungen zur ausgebildeten turbulenz, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 5, 21, pp. 136-139, (1925)
  • [8] Coakley TI., Turbulence modeling methods for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations
  • [9] Johnson DA, King LS., A mathematically simple turbulence closure model for attached and separated turbulent boundary layers, AIAA Journal, 23, 11, pp. 1684-1692, (1985)
  • [10] Bradshaw P, Ferriss DH, Atwell NP., Calculation of boundary layer development using the turbulent energy equation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 28, 3, pp. 593-616, (1967)