Multi-layer weighted grey principal component evaluation model and its application

被引:0
|
作者
Wang L.-L. [1 ,2 ]
Fang Z.-G. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
[2] Department of Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang
来源
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2019年 / 34卷 / 06期
关键词
Grey evaluation; Multi-index evaluation; Multi-layer weighted; Principal component evaluation; Similitude degree of grey incidence; Thermal power generation unit;
D O I
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2017.1405
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Considering the lack of primitive variables and samples, which exists objectively in the evaluation practice, the multi-layer weighted grey principal component evaluation model is constructed. Firstly, the normalized importance weights are assigned to the subsystem of the evaluation system and the corresponding indices respectively under the premise that all of them are established scientifically. On that basis, the weighted normalized matrix for evaluation is generated to calculate the grey similitude correlation degree matrix, and the principal component scores of each evaluation subsystem are calculated based on it instead of the traditional correlation matrix. Then, the final evaluation basis is obtained through weighting the scores of each evaluation subsystem by their importance weights. Finally, performances of thermal power generation units are analyzed comparatively by using different evaluation models including the proposed model. Theoretical research and case analysis demonstrate that the proposed model is scientific, effective and more suitable in these situations where there are insufficient evaluation variables, or the sample size is small, as well as there may be a non-linear correlation between evaluation indicators. © 2019, Editorial Office of Control and Decision. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1306
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Scholkopf B., Smola A., Muller K.R., Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem, Neural Computation, 10, 5, pp. 1299-1319, (1998)
  • [2] Li J.H., Guo Y.H., Principal component evaluation--A multivariate evaluate method expanded from principal component analysis, J of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 16, 1, pp. 39-43, (2002)
  • [3] Li Z.X., Guo J.S., Hui X.B., Dimension reduction method for multivariate time series based on common principal Component, Control and Decision, 28, 4, pp. 531-536, (2013)
  • [4] Huang N., The application and consideration about principal component analysis, J of Applied Statistics and Management, 18, 5, pp. 44-46, (1999)
  • [5] Ye S.F., The application and consideration about principal component analysis, J of Applied Statistics and Management, 20, 2, pp. 52-55, (2001)
  • [6] Lin H.M., Du Z.F., Some problems in comprehensive evaluation in the principal component analysis, Statistical Research, 30, 8, pp. 25-31, (2013)
  • [7] Meng S.W., Some problems in multi-index comprehensive evaluation based on principal component analysis, Statistical Research, 9, 4, pp. 67-68, (1992)
  • [8] Dou J.B., Lu X.H., Yang P.Y., Research on evaluation for the standard of military equipment readiness based on improved principal components analysis method, Command Control & Simulation, 33, 1, pp. 71-73, (2011)
  • [9] Shang L.Q., Wang S.P., Application of improved principal component analysis in comprehensive assessment on thermal power generation units, Power System Technology, 38, 7, pp. 1928-1933, (2014)
  • [10] Zhou L.Q., Xu X.Y., Jia C., Application of improved principal component analysis in comprehensive assessment on regional water resource, China Rural Water and Hydropower, 3, pp. 88-91, (2014)