Exploring the immediate and short-term effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial of healthy participants

被引:0
|
作者
Schumacher, Matthew R. [1 ]
Swanson, Colton [1 ]
Wolff, Saydee [1 ]
Orteza, Rylee [1 ]
Aguilar, Rudy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mary, Bismarck, ND 58504 USA
关键词
Lumbar manipulation; Pain pressure threshold; Neurophysiological effects; Manual therapy; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-PRACTICE-GUIDELINES; OF-FUNCT DISABILITY; MANUAL THERAPY; NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION; INTERVENTIONS; MOBILIZATION; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-024-00540-5
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Lumbar spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common intervention used to treat low back pain (LBP); however, the exact neurophysiological mechanisms of SMT reducing pain measured through pain pressure threshold (PPT) have not been fully explored beyond an immediate timeframe (e.g., immediately or five-minutes following) referencing a control group. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the neurophysiological effects of lumbar SMT compared to deactivated ultrasound using PPT immediately following and 30-minutes following SMT. Methods A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial design was conducted between September to October 2023. Fifty-five participants were randomized into a control group of deactivated ultrasound (n = 29) or treatment group of right sidelying lumbar SMT (n = 26). PPT, recorded at the right posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), was documented for each participant in each group prior to intervention, immediately, and 30-minutes after. A repeated measures ANOVA, with a post-hoc Bonferroni adjustment, was used to assess within-group and between-group differences in PPT. The significance level was set at a < 0.05 a priori. Results Statistically significant differences were found between the deactivated ultrasound and lumbar SMT groups immediately (p = .05) and 30-minutes (p = .02) following intervention. A significant difference in the lumbar SMT group was identified from baseline to immediately following (p < .001) and 30-minutes following (p < .001), but no differences between immediately following and 30-minutes following intervention (p = .10). The deactivated ultrasound group demonstrated a difference between baseline and immediately after intervention with a reduced PPT (p = .003), but no significant difference was found from baseline to 30-minutes (p = .11) or immediately after intervention to 30-minutes (p = 1.0). Conclusion A right sidelying lumbar manipulation increased PPT at the right PSIS immediately after that lasted to 30-minutes when compared to a deactivated ultrasound control group. Future studies should further explore beyond the immediate and short-term neurophysiological effects of lumbar SMT to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF A SPINAL MANIPULATION ON PAIN PRESSURE THRESHOLD IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MECHANICAL LOW-BACK-PAIN
    COTE, P
    MIOR, SA
    VERNON, H
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 17 (06) : 364 - 368
  • [2] Short-Term Effect of Spinal Manipulation on the Magnitude of Exophoria in Adults Who Are Asymptomatic: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fernandez-Seguin, Lourdes
    Peinado-Asensio, Manuel
    Diaz-Mancha, Juan Antonio
    Cortes-Vega, Maria-Dolores
    Heredia-Rizo, Alberto
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 103 (08):
  • [3] Short-Term Usual Chiropractic Care for Spinal Pain A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Walker, Bruce F.
    Hebert, Jeff J.
    Stomski, Norman J.
    Losco, Barrett
    French, Simon D.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (24) : 2071 - 2078
  • [4] THE SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF KETTLEBELL SWINGS ON LUMBOPELVIC PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLDS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Keilman, Brandon M.
    Hanney, William J.
    Kolber, Morey J.
    Pabian, Patrick S.
    Salamh, Paul A.
    Rothschild, Carey E.
    Liu, Xinliang
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2017, 31 (11) : 3001 - 3009
  • [5] The short-term effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of infantile colic: A randomized controlled clinical trial with a blinded observer
    Wiberg, JMM
    Nordsteen, J
    Nilsson, N
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 22 (08) : 517 - 522
  • [7] Immediate and Short-term Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Young, Ian A.
    Pozzi, Federico
    Dunning, James
    Linkonis, Richard
    Michener, Lori A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 49 (05): : 299 - +
  • [8] Immediate and short-term pain relief by acute sciatic nerve press: A randomized controlled trial
    He J.
    Wu B.
    Zhang W.
    Ten G.
    BMC Anesthesiology, 7 (1)
  • [9] Short-Term Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Pain Perception, Spinal Mobility, and Full Height Recovery in Male Subjects With Degenerative Disk Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vieira-Pellenz, Felipe
    Oliva-Pascual-Vaca, Angel
    Rodriguez-Blanco, Cleofas
    Marcos Heredia-Rizo, Alberto
    Ricard, Francois
    Almazan-Campos, Gines
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (09): : 1613 - 1619
  • [10] Comparative short-term effects of two thoracic spinal manipulation techniques in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Casanova-Mendez, Amaloha
    Oliva-Pascual-Vaca, Angel
    Rodriguez-Blanco, Cleofas
    Heredia-Rizo, Alberto Marcos
    Gogorza-Arroitaonandia, Kristobal
    Almazan-Campos, Gines
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2014, 19 (04) : 331 - 337