MUC16 as a serum-based prognostic indicator of prometastatic gastric cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jieun [1 ]
Lee, Sang Wook [2 ]
Kang, So Hyun [1 ]
Seol, Donghyeok [1 ]
Yoo, Mira [1 ]
Hwang, Duyeong [1 ]
Lee, Eunju [3 ]
Park, Young Suk [1 ]
Ahn, Sang-Hoon [1 ]
Suh, Yun-Suhk [1 ]
Park, Kyoung Un [4 ,5 ]
Kwon, Nak-Jung [2 ]
Kim, Hyung-Ho [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Surg, Seongnam Si 17382, South Korea
[2] Macrogen Inc, Precis Med Inst, 254 Beotkkot Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Surg, Gwangmyeong Hosp, Gwangmyeong Si, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Seongnam Si, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Chung Ang Univ, Gwang Myeong Hosp, Gwangmyeong Si, South Korea
[7] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Gastric cancer; Metastasis; Serum-based prognostic marker; Olink; MUC16; CARBONIC-ANHYDRASE IX; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-64798-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Metastatic gastric cancer (GC) presents significant clinical challenges due to its poor prognosis and limited treatment options. To address this, we conducted a targeted protein biomarker discovery study to identify markers predictive of metastasis in advanced GC (AGC). Serum samples from 176 AGC patients (T stage 3 or higher) were analyzed using the Olink Proteomics Target panels. Patients were retrospectively categorized into nonmetastatic, metastatic, and recurrence groups, and differential protein expression was assessed. Machine learning and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) methods were applied to discover biomarkers and predict prognosis. Four proteins (MUC16, CAIX, 5'-NT, and CD8A) were significantly elevated in metastatic GC patients compared to the control group. Additionally, GSEA indicated that the response to interleukin-4 and hypoxia-related pathways were enriched in metastatic patients. Random forest classification and decision-tree modeling showed that MUC16 could be a predictive marker for metastasis in GC patients. Additionally, ELISA validation confirmed elevated MUC16 levels in metastatic patients. Notably, high MUC16 levels were independently associated with metastatic progression in T3 or higher GC. These findings suggest the potential of MUC16 as a clinically relevant biomarker for identifying GC patients at high risk of metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioinformatics Analysis Based on TCGA: MUC16 Mutation Correlates with Clinical Outcome in Gastric Cancer
    Huang, Liang
    Zheng, Shuang
    Fu, Junhui
    Zhang, Meng
    Ge, Xiaogang
    Mu, Ning
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2022, 2022
  • [2] MUC16 Mutations and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer A Little Goes a Long Way
    Smyth, Elizabeth C.
    Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (12) : 1698 - 1699
  • [3] MUC16 as a novel target for cancer therapy
    Aithal, Abhijit
    Rauth, Sanchita
    Kshirsagar, Prakash
    Shah, Ashu
    Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban
    Junker, Wade M.
    Jain, Maneesh
    Ponnusamy, Moorthy P.
    Batra, Surinder K.
    EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC TARGETS, 2018, 22 (08) : 675 - 686
  • [4] Association of MUC16 Mutation With Tumor Mutation Load and Outcomes in Patients With Gastric Cancer
    Li, Xiangchun
    Pasche, Boris
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Kexin
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (12) : 1691 - 1698
  • [5] Why MUC16 mutations lead to a better prognosis: A study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas gastric cancer cohort
    Huang, Yu-Jie
    Cao, Zhi-Fei
    Wang, Jie
    Yang, Jian
    Wei, Yi-Jun
    Tang, Yu-Chen
    Cheng, Yin-Xiang
    Zhou, Jian
    Zhang, Zi-Xiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (17) : 4143 - 4158
  • [6] Why MUC16 mutations lead to a better prognosis: A study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas gastric cancer cohort
    Yu-Jie Huang
    Zhi-Fei Cao
    Jie Wang
    Jian Yang
    Yi-Jun Wei
    Yu-Chen Tang
    Yin-Xiang Cheng
    Jian Zhou
    Zi-Xiang Zhang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, 9 (17) : 4143 - 4158
  • [7] Study of MUC16/ERBB axis in pancreatic cancer
    Baniya, Amina
    Hollingsworth, Michael A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (02)
  • [8] Pathobiological Implications of MUC16 Expression in Pancreatic Cancer
    Haridas, Dhanya
    Chakraborty, Subhankar
    Ponnusamy, Moorthy P.
    Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban
    Rachagani, Satyanarayana
    Cruz, Eric
    Kumar, Sushil
    Das, Srustidhar
    Lele, Subodh M.
    Anderson, Judy M.
    Wittel, Uwe A.
    Hollingsworth, Michael A.
    Batra, Surinder K.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (10):
  • [9] MUC1 and MUC16: critical for immune modulation in cancer therapeutics
    Chen, Xinyi
    Sandrine, Ineza Karambizi
    Yang, Mu
    Tu, Jingyao
    Yuan, Xianglin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [10] Transcription factors that regulate MUC16 expression in ovarian cancer
    Thapi, Dharmarao
    Binder, Darcie
    Rosales, Nestor
    Yan, Xiu Jun
    Lash, Alex E.
    Spriggs, David R.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71