Reliability Analysis of Phased-Mission Smart Home Systems With Cascading Common Cause Failures

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Qian [1 ]
Wang, Chaonan [1 ]
Guan, Quanlong [1 ]
Shi, Jiaqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Guangzhou 511443, Peoples R China
关键词
Cascading failure; common cause failure (CCF); multivalued decision diagram (MDD); phased-mission system (PMS); reliability analysis; smart home system (SHS); FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2024.3387693
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the ability to produce renewable energy sources and control system devices in an adaptive way, smart home systems (SHSs) have significantly improved the quality of our lives. Due to the mission-critical nature and the complex correlations within the system, it is imperative to perform reliability analysis on SHSs. This article studies the reliability of SHSs performing multiphase mission and subject to both common cause failures and cascading behaviors, where the occurrence of common causes would cause failures of multiple components and the failure of a component may further affect other system components in a domino chain manner. In this article, we propose a multivalued decision diagram-based method to assess reliability of phased-mission SHS with cascading common cause effect. The proposed method, applicable to arbitrary time-to-failure distributions, is generalized to reliability analysis of SHSs with multiple repeated operation cycles. Both space and computational complexities of the proposed method are discussed; the correctness is verified using the Monte Carlo simulation method. A detailed case study on an SHS example is performed to illustrate the application and advantages of the proposed method. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to examine the contribution of each component failure to the overall failure of the example SHS.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability of Nonrepairable Phased-Mission Systems With Common Cause Failures
    Levitin, Gregory
    Xing, Liudong
    Amari, Suprasad V.
    Dai, Yuanshun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2013, 43 (04): : 967 - 978
  • [2] Probabilistic common cause failures in phased-mission systems
    Wang, Chaonan
    Xing, Liudong
    Levitin, Gregory
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 144 : 53 - 60
  • [3] Formal Analysis of Repairable Phased-Mission Systems With Common Cause Failures
    Shao, Qi
    Yang, Shunkun
    Bian, Chong
    Gou, Xiaodong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2021, 70 (01) : 416 - 427
  • [4] Reliability analysis of phased mission systems with common cause failures
    Tang, ZH
    Xu, H
    Dugan, JB
    [J]. ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2005 PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 313 - 318
  • [5] Reliability evaluation of non-repairable phased-mission common bus systems with common cause failures
    Yu, Huan
    Yang, Jun
    Lin, Jing
    Zhao, Yu
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 111 : 445 - 457
  • [6] Reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with imperfect fault coverage and common-cause failures
    Xing, Liudong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2007, 56 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [7] Reliability of Phased-Mission Systems Subject to Competing Failures
    Wang, Chaonan
    Xing, Liudong
    Levitin, Gregory
    [J]. 59TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2013,
  • [8] BDD-based reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with internal/external common-cause failures
    Xing, Liudong
    Levitin, Gregory
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 112 : 145 - 153
  • [9] An implicit method for probabilistic common cause failures in phased-mission system
    Wu, Huan
    Jiao, Jian
    Zhao, Runjiang
    Chew, Zhiwei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ICRSE 2017), 2017,
  • [10] BDD-based reliability analysis of phased-mission systems with multimode failures
    Tang, Zhihua
    Dugan, Joanne Bechta
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2006, 55 (02) : 350 - 360