Arrival-time picking uncertainty: Theoretical estimations and their application to microseismic data

被引:0
|
作者
Abakumov I. [1 ]
Roeser A. [1 ]
Shapiro S.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Earth Sciences, Malteserstrasse 74-100, Berlin
来源
Geophysics | 2020年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
borehole geophysics; microseismic; passive seismic; travel time;
D O I
10.1190/geo2019-0589.1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traveltime-based methods depend on the accurate determination of the arrival times of seismic waves. They further benefit from information on the uncertainty with which the arrival times are determined. Among other applications, arrival-time uncertainties are used to weight data in inversion algorithms and to define the resolution of reconstructed velocity models. The most physically meaningful approaches for the estimation of arrival-time uncertainties are based on probabilistic formulations. The two approaches for the assessment of the lower bound of arrival-time uncertainties, the Cramér-Rao Bound (CRB) and the Ziv-Zakai Bound (ZZB), have been reviewed. The CRB determines the minimum-achievable estimation error under the assumption of a high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) but underestimates said error for small S/N. The ZZB provides a better result for noisy data because it utilizes a priori information. The CRB and ZZB require knowledge of the spectral variance of the signal, which often is hard to determine in seismic experiments. Furthermore, both bounds assume additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), which does not hold for seismic data. To overcome these problems, alternative expressions have been proposed, which yield comparable estimates as CRB and ZZB but are solely based on the S/N and the dominant period in the data. Moreover, a recipe to correct the S/N and account for the difference between the seismic noise and AWGN has been provided. For a case study of downhole microseismic monitoring, it is determined that the new expressions provide station-dependent arrival-time uncertainties, which are used as weights to improve source location uncertainties. © 2020 Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
引用
收藏
页码:U65 / U76
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arrival-time picking uncertainty: Theoretical estimations and their application to microseismic data
    Abakumov, Ivan
    Roeser, Aurelian
    Shapiro, Serge A.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (04) : U65 - U76
  • [2] A review and appraisal of arrival-time picking methods for downhole microseismic data
    Akram, Jubran
    Eaton, David W.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 81 (02) : KS71 - KS91
  • [3] Arrival-time picking method based on approximate negentropy for microseismic data
    Li, Yue
    Ni, Zhuo
    Tian, Yanan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 152 : 100 - 109
  • [4] Arrival-time picking of microseismic events based on MSNet
    Sheng G.
    Yang S.
    Guo X.
    Tang X.
    Geophysics, 2021, 87 (02)
  • [5] Arrival-time picking of microseismic events based on MSNet
    Sheng, Guanqun
    Yang, Shuangyu
    Tang, Xin-Gong
    Guo, Xiaolong
    GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 87 (02) : KS57 - KS71
  • [6] ARRIVAL TIME PICKING OF MICROSEISMIC DATA BY USING SPE ALGORITHM
    Dong, Xintong
    Jiang, Hong
    Li, Yue
    Yang, Baojun
    JOURNAL OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION, 2019, 28 (05): : 475 - 494
  • [7] First arrival time picking for microseismic data based on DWSW algorithm
    Yue Li
    Yue Wang
    Hongbo Lin
    Tie Zhong
    Journal of Seismology, 2018, 22 : 833 - 840
  • [8] First arrival time picking for microseismic data based on DWSW algorithm
    Li, Yue
    Wang, Yue
    Lin, Hongbo
    Zhong, Tie
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2018, 22 (04) : 833 - 840
  • [9] First arrival time picking for microseismic data based on shearlet transform
    Cheng, Yao
    Li, Yue
    Zhang, Chao
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 14 (02) : 262 - 271
  • [10] Automatic arrival-time picking of P- and S-waves of microseismic events based on object detection and CNN
    Li, Jiaming
    Li, Kunyao
    Tang, Shibin
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 164