Water Footprint Flow and Vulnerability of China's Provincial Energy Sector

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Han [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Zhenghao [1 ]
Chen, Lu [1 ]
Yang, Xiaohui [1 ]
Ni, Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Resource & Environm Econ Res Ctr, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy-water; water footprint flow; vulnerability assessment; multi-regional input and output; entropy weight TOPSIS model; POWER-GENERATION; ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION; SUPPLY CHAIN; SCENARIOS; TRANSFERS; STRESS;
D O I
10.1142/S2382624X24500024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Water and energy are mutually reinforcing elements in production and consumption activities, forming an inseparable relationship. This study, conducted at the provincial level, investigates the intricate connections between energy water footprint flow, water shortage, and water pollution. It aims to elucidate the vulnerability of provincial energy sectors to water use, fostering regional coordinated management for sustainable energy and water development. Utilizing a multi-regional input-output model, the research analyzes both the quantity and quality of water resources. The water footprint of China's provincial energy sector is quantified and scrutinized. Furthermore, an evaluation index system is constructed based on the water footprint concept. The entropy weight TOPSIS method is then applied to assess the vulnerability of inter-provincial energy sector water footprints. The key findings are as follows: (1) The energy water footprint has shifted from water resource-deficient areas, such as the northwest, North China, and northeast, to economically developed regions with relatively abundant water resources, such as East China and South China. This reveals that the transfer of water footprints in economic activities does not entirely alleviate water shortages in China and may even exacerbate shortages in certain water-deficient areas. (2) The graywater footprint of the energy sector is significantly larger than the blue water footprint and water shortage footprint. (3) The production and supply departments of power and heat emerge as the largest contributors to the transfer of energy and water footprints from water shortage areas to water-rich areas, followed by coal mining and dressing departments. (4) Top 10 Vulnerable Provinces: Tibet, Zhejiang, Ningxia, Tianjin, Jiangsu, Henan, Hunan, Beijing, Chongqing, and Hebei are identified as the top 10 provinces vulnerable to water footprints in the energy sector. This vulnerability closely correlates with the energy sector's dependence on water footprints and production leverage. Recommendations include optimizing the energy mix and establishing stable external water footprint supply channels for provinces with high water footprint dependence. Provinces with high production leverage are advised to accelerate innovation and application of water-saving technologies in key energy sectors, increase the utilization of clean energy, and enhance resource recycling. National government departments should focus on controlling and reducing water pollutants in the energy sector across regions, addressing water shortages by purifying water bodies and improving water quality.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water footprint of the energy sector in China's two megalopolises
    Liao, Xiawei
    Zhao, Xu
    Jiang, Yu
    Liu, Yu
    Yi, Yujun
    Tillotson, Martin R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2019, 391 : 9 - 15
  • [2] China's provincial grey water footprint characteristic and driving forces
    Zhang, Lei
    Dong, Huijuan
    Geng, Yong
    Francisco, Medel-Jimenez
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 677 : 427 - 435
  • [3] Assessment on the flow and vulnerability of water footprint network of Beijing city, China
    Yu, Deyong
    Ding, Tiancong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
  • [4] Accessing provincial energy efficiencies in China's transport sector
    Xie, Chunping
    Bai, Mengqi
    Wang, Xiaolei
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 123 : 525 - 532
  • [5] China's water footprint by province, and inter-provincial transfer of virtual water
    Chen, Weiming
    Wu, Sanmang
    Lei, Yalin
    Li, Shantong
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 74 : 321 - 333
  • [6] Provincial water footprint in China and its critical path
    Zhao, Guomei
    Gao, Chao
    Xie, Rui
    Lai, Mingyong
    Yang, Ligao
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 105 : 634 - 644
  • [7] Comparing water footprint and water scarcity footprint of energy demand in China's six megacities
    Liao, Xiawei
    Zhao, Xu
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Li, Ruoshui
    Wang, Xiaoxi
    Wang, Wenpeng
    Tillotson, Martin R.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 269
  • [8] Uncovering regional disparity of China's water footprint and inter-provincial virtual water flows
    Dong, Huijuan
    Geng, Yong
    Fujita, Tsuyoshi
    Fujii, Minoru
    Hao, Dong
    Yu, Xiaoman
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 500 : 120 - 130
  • [9] Revision on China's energy data by sector and fuel type at provincial level
    Liao, Hua
    Wang, Ce
    Liu, Yanan
    Gao, Yixuan
    Wang, Fangzhi
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 12 (04) : 849 - 861
  • [10] Revision on China’s energy data by sector and fuel type at provincial level
    Hua Liao
    Ce Wang
    Yanan Liu
    Yixuan Gao
    Fangzhi Wang
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2019, 12 : 849 - 861