Monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF

被引：1

作者：

Kol, Shahar ^{[1
]}

Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos ^{[2
]}

Trolice, Mark P. ^{[3
]}

Quaas, Alexander M. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Elisha Hosp, IVF Unit, Haifa, Israel

[2] Inst Bernabeu, Dept Reprod Med, Alicante, Spain

[3] IVF Ctr Orlando, Fertil Care, Orlando, FL USA

[4] Shady Grove Fertil, 462 Stevens Ave,Ste 206,Solana Beach, San Diego, CA 92075 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS | 2024年 / 41卷 / 07期

关键词：

In vitro fertilization (IVF); Assisted reproductive technology (ART); Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS); Ovarian stimulation protocols; Ultrasound monitoring in IVF; GNRH AGONIST; EFFICACY; OOCYTES; CYCLES;

D O I：

10.1007/s10815-024-03182-x

中图分类号：

Q3 [遗传学];

学科分类号：

071007 ; 090102 ;

摘要：

Since the inception of in vitro fertilization (IVF), monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has traditionally involved numerous appointments for ultrasound and laboratory testing to guide medication use and dosing, determine trigger timing, and allow for measures to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Recent advances in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have called into question the timing and frequency of COS monitoring appointments, as discussed in this commentary.

引用

页码：1715 / 1717

页数：3

共 50 条

[1] Lean Management Improves the Process Efficiency of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Monitoring in IVF Treatment
Muharam, R.
Firman, F.
[J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
[2] ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation
Bercaire, Ludmila
Nogueira, Sara M. B.
Lima, Priscila C. M.
Alves, Vanessa R.
Donadio, Nilka
Dzik, Artur
Cavagna, Mario
Fanchin, Renato
[J]. JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2018, 22 (01): : 52 - 55
[3] Ovarian response is associated with anogenital distance in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF
Fabregues, F.
Gonzalez-Foruria, I.
Penarrubia, J.
Carmona, F.
[J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 (09) : 1696 - 1704
[4] Case report: undetectable estradiol levels by a chemiluminescence method during a controlled ovarian stimulation monitoring for IVF.
Gotusso, SI
Papier, SD
Lipowicz, RG
Calamera, JC
Acosta, AA
[J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) : S125 - S125
[5] Comparison of automated and manual follicle monitoring in an unrestricted population of 100 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF
Ata, Baris
Seyhan, Ayse
Reinblatt, Shauna Leigh
Shalom-Paz, Einat
Krishnamurthy, Srinivasan
Tan, Seang Lin
[J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (01) : 127 - 133
[6] Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF
Verberg, M. F. G.
Macklon, N. S.
Nargund, G.
Frydman, R.
Devroey, P.
Broekmans, F. J.
Fauser, B. C. J. M.
[J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2009, 15 (01) : 13 - 29
[7] Minimal ovarian stimulation and IVF
Pattnayak, Monu
Ray, Rajat K.
[J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (04): : 356 - 357
[8] Ovarian response predictive model in different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF/ICSI treatment
Micic, J.
Surlan, L.
Dotlic, J.
Milic, N.
Vidakovic, S.
Radunovic, N.
[J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06): : 923 - 928
[9] Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice
La Marca, Antonio
Sunkara, Sesh Kamal
[J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2014, 20 (01) : 124 - 140
[10] Monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation to limit twin pregnancy
Illingworth, Peter
[J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 46 : S25 - S26

← 1 2 3 4 5 →