Optimization Method of Optical Flow Pyramid Interpolation for Particle Image Velocimetry

被引:0
|
作者
Shan Liang [1 ]
Jian Juan [1 ]
Xiong Junzhe [1 ]
Shi Feiyang [1 ]
Hong Bo [1 ]
Lou Xiaoying [1 ]
Kong Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Key Lab Electromagnet Wave Informat Technol & Met, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Metrol & Measurement Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Particle image velocimetry; Optical flow method; Root mean square error; Average angular error; image interpolation; Fluid Measurement; Velocity field reconstruction;
D O I
10.3788/gzxb20245303.0312002
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In order to enhance the retention of angle information in complex flow fields and reduce edge step distortion and blur effects caused by the reconstruction process, this paper proposes an optical flow pyramid interpolation optimization method for particle image velocity measurement based on the multi-scale pyramid iterative optical flow algorithm and nearest neighbor interpolation. By calculating the distance between each site and grid points, the grid point with the smallest distance is identified and its value is assigned to the site. In addition, the nearest pixels with similar gradient directions are searched in the current image plane for corner correspondence. This approach preserves original edges while reducing step distortion and blurring effects commonly encountered in optical flow algorithms. As a result, it helps minimizing reconstruction angle error and root mean square error, particularly at image edges. The proposed algorithm was tested for its reconstruction effect in different flow fields through simulation experiments, including single vortex current, double vortex current, and DNS turbulence, under various parameters. Both the proposed algorithm and common algorithms were employed to simulate these flow fields, and the reconstructed results were compared with the true values. The accuracy of the algorithm was quantitatively evaluated using root-mean-square error and average angle error. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves closer reconstruction results to the true values across all three flow fields. Specifically, compared to pre-optimization, the root- mean- square error and average angle error were increased by 15.96% and 19.87% respectively in the single vortex current field, by 15.03% and 19.56% in the pair vortex current field, and by 14.90% and 17.37% in the DNS turbulent field. Notably, at image edges, the proposed algorithm exhibits smaller reconstruction errors which validate its correctness while also indicating its ability to effectively retain angle information thereby reducing reconstruction errors. The accuracy of PIV reconstruction is influenced by two important parameters, namely particle size and displacement. To investigate the impact of particle size and particle displacement on the reconstruction effect of PIV in the flow field, a total of 50, 000 imaging particles were randomly distributed in a two-dimensional imaging plane measuring 256 pxx256 px. The previous-used three flow fields, including single vortex current, double vortex current, and DNS turbulence, were subjected to 400 iterations of optical flow using both the proposed algorithm and the conventional optical flow algorithm. This analysis aimed to assess how particle size and displacement affect the root mean square error (RMSE) and average angular error (AAE) of the reconstructed results. The findings demonstrate that under different conditions of particle size and displacement, the proposed algorithm outperforms the conventional optical flow algorithm in terms of fitting accuracy as well as precision during optical flow iteration. Specifically, when keeping particle size constant, small displacements can increase RMSE accuracy by approximately 18%, while large displacements can enhance it by about 15%. Moreover, when maintaining a constant displacement size within a range of 1 px similar to 7 px for particle sizes, both RMSE and AAE values obtained from the proposed algorithm surpass those achieved with common optical flow algorithms. To verify the performance of the algorithm in practice, an experimental system based on two-dimensional PIV principle is built. The 100 micron PSP particles were used as tracer particles, and a certain amount of tracer particles was added to the quartz container containing dimethylsilicone oil as the flow field to be measured. An electric slide table is used to rotate and inject water into the flow field to simulate the vortex current field and jet field respectively. The images of the flow field to be measured captured by the CMOS camera are put into the PIV system for analysis and reconstruction. The reconstruction results show that the optimized algorithm in this paper can obtain a velocity field consistent with the manifold of common algorithms, which verifies the correctness of the proposed algorithm. It also shows that the proposed algorithm has good practicability in the actual complex flow field.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] SCATTERING PARTICLE CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR EFFECT ON PULSED LASER MEASUREMENTS OF FLUID-FLOW - SPECKLE VELOCIMETRY VS PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY
    ADRIAN, RJ
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 1984, 23 (11): : 1690 - 1691
  • [2] Analysis of turbulent flow and thermal structures in low-Prandtl number buoyant flows using direct numerical simulations
    Bhushan, S.
    Elmellouki, M.
    Walters, D. K.
    Hassan, Y. A.
    Merzari, E.
    Obabko, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2022, 189
  • [3] Stereoscopic PIV using optical flow: application to a cavity recirculation
    Douay, Christelle L.
    Faure, Thierry M.
    Lusseyran, Francois
    [J]. EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2013, 54 (08)
  • [4] Investigation of Turbulence Parameters Based on Liquid-phase Cloud Microphysics Fluctuation Measured by Digital Holography
    Gao Pan
    Wang Jun
    Tang Jiabin
    Gao Yangzi
    Liu Jingjing
    Yan Qing
    Hua Dengxin
    [J]. ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA, 2021, 50 (07)
  • [5] DETERMINING OPTICAL-FLOW
    HORN, BKP
    SCHUNCK, BG
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1981, 17 (1-3) : 185 - 203
  • [6] Kajo I, 2015, 2015 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICSPCS)
  • [7] Liu T., 2021, J. Open Res. Softw, V9, P3, DOI [10.5334/jors.326, DOI 10.5334/JORS.326]
  • [8] LIU T., 2019, Journal of Fluids Engineering, V142
  • [9] Comparison between optical flow and cross-correlation methods for extraction of velocity fields from particle images
    Liu, Tianshu
    Merat, Ali
    Makhmalbaf, M. H. M.
    Fajardo, Claudia
    Merati, Parviz
    [J]. EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2015, 56 (08)
  • [10] A field-segmentation-based variational optical flow method for PIV measurements of nonuniform flows
    Lu, Jin
    Yang, Hua
    Zhang, Qinghu
    Yin, Zhouping
    [J]. EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2019, 60 (09)