Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin During Low-Risk Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Alturkmani, Hani [1 ]
Uretsky, Barry [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Swetal [3 ]
Albadaineh, Mu'nes [4 ]
Alqaisi, Omar [4 ]
Alaiwah, Malek [1 ]
Cross, Michael [1 ]
Abbasi, Danish [1 ]
Rollefson, William [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Cent Arkansas Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Dept Cardiol, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Cardiol, Las Vegas, NV USA
[4] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Internal Med, Little Rock, AR USA
[5] Arkansas Heart Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Little Rock, AR USA
来源
关键词
anticoagulation; enoxaparin; heparin; percutaneous coronary intervention; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; VS. UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN; INTRAVENOUS ENOXAPARIN; WEIGHT HEPARIN; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANTICOAGULATION; TIROFIBAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.02.033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the most frequently used anticoagulant for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intravenous enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, has superior pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with UFH. Multiple trials have shown enoxaparin to be safe and effective in PCI. However, there has not been a contemporary study evaluating its safety and efficacy. To assess its efficacy and safety, intravenous enoxaparin during PCI through radial artery access was evaluated in PCI patients from January 2015 to December 2019. Outcomes included procedural success, all-cause mortality, ischemic complications, and bleeding complications from the time of the procedure until hospital discharge. A total of 1019 consecutive eligible patients were identified. Median age was 63 years, and 70% were men. The indication for PCI was stable and unstable angina in two-thirds of cases (77%). Few patients had myocardial infarction (MI) ( 2.2% ) as the indication for intervention. The procedure was successful in 98.2% of cases. There were no deaths. Procedural MI occurred in 0.3% of patients. Acute stent thrombosis occurred in 0.4%. Urgent revascularization and stroke occurred in 0.1% each. Small wrist hematomas occurred in 0.3% and all were managed conservatively. There was one radial artery pseudoaneurysm. There were no cases of major bleeding. In conclusion, this single-center study showed that intravenous enoxaparin is a reasonable alternative anticoagulant for use in low-risk and elective non -MI PCI through radial artery access. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2024;218:63 - 67)
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Albadaineh, M.
    Alturkmani, H.
    Patel, S.
    Alqaisi, O.
    Alaiwah, M.
    Cross, M.
    Abbasi, D.
    Uretsky, B.
    Rollefson, W.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (04) : S13 - S13
  • [2] Enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention
    Bhala, Neeraj
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (26): : 2788 - 2788
  • [3] Low dose intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention
    Choussat, R
    Montalescot, G
    Collet, JP
    Gallois, V
    Sotirov, Y
    Drobinski, G
    Thomas, D
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 706 - 706
  • [4] A unique, low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention
    Choussat, R
    Montalescot, G
    Collet, JP
    Vicaut, E
    Ankri, A
    Gallois, V
    Drobinski, G
    Sotirov, I
    Thomas, D
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (11) : 1943 - 1950
  • [5] Enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention - The authors reply
    Montalescot, Gilles
    White, Harvey D.
    Steinhubl, Steven R.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (26): : 2790 - 2791
  • [6] Safety of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Diez, Jose G.
    Medina, Hector M.
    Cheong, Benjamin Y. C.
    O'Meallie, Lawrence
    Ferguson, James J.
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2009, 36 (02): : 98 - 103
  • [7] Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 1-Year Results From the STEEPLE (SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in Percutaneous coronary intervention patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation) Trial
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Gallo, Richard
    White, Harvey D.
    Cohen, Marc
    Steg, Gabriel
    Aylward, Philip E. G.
    Bode, Christoph
    Chiariello, Massimo
    King, Spencer B., III
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Desmet, Walter J.
    Macaya, Carlos
    Steinhubl, Steven R.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (11) : 1083 - 1091
  • [8] Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention
    Montalescot, Gilles
    White, Harvey D.
    Gallo, Richard
    Cohen, Marc
    Steg, P. Gabriel
    Aylward, Philip E. G.
    Bode, Christoph
    Chiariello, Massimo
    King, Spencer B., III
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Desmet, Walter J.
    Macaya, Carlos
    Steinhubl, Steven R.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (10): : 1006 - 1017
  • [9] Clinical efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in unselected Swiss patients undergoing primary or elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Analysis of the RIVIERA study
    Weber, Klaus
    Spirk, David
    Pieper, Michael
    Kucher, Nils
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2009, 64 (04) : 455 - 459
  • [10] Practical Issues on the Use of Enoxaparin in Elective and Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Diez, Jose G.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 20 (09): : 482 - 489