Decision and coordination mechanism in supply chain based on user innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang F. [1 ]
An G. [1 ]
Zhang Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lead user; Revenue sharing contract; Supply chain coordination; User innovation;
D O I
10.13196/j.cims.2020.05.024
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To analyze the impact of user innovation on the optimal decision supply chain, based on identifying the demand of lead users with utility function of consumers, the centralized decision-making model, decentralized decision-making model and revenue-sharing contract supply chain model were constructed, and Stackelberg game method was used for solving to obtain the optimal pricing strategy, demand of lead users and contract parameter range of manufacturer and retailer in equilibrium. Through numerical simulation, the profit, price and demand of the supply chain and its members under the decentralized decision-making model with revenue sharing contract were compared. The results showed that the revenue sharing contract could effectively coordinate the supply chain and increase the profit of supply chain compared with the decentralized decision-making model. The increase of consumer innovation subsidy did not significantly stimulate the demand of lead users, but an optimal innovation subsidy that maximized the profit was existed. When the consumer innovation subsidy was fixed and the manufacturer's technology absorptive capacity was from low to high, the relationship between consumer knowledge level and wholesale price or retail price changes from positive correlation to negative correlation. The stronger the technology absorptive capacity was, the more sensitive the wholesale price of decentralized model or the retail price of contract with growing level of consumer knowledge. The level of consumer knowledge of two models had a positive impact on the demand of lead users, supply chain members and its overall profits. When the manufacturer's technology absorptive capacity was low, it tended to use revenue-sharing contract to increase the overall profit of supply chain and the technological absorptive capacity of a manufacturer played a decisive role in its profits. © 2020, Editorial Department of CIMS. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1406
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] VON HIPPEL E., Democratizing innovation, pp. 1-18, (2005)
  • [2] VON HIPPEL E, DE JONG J, FLOWERS S., Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: findings from a representative survey in the UK, Management Science, 58, 9, pp. 1669-1681, (2012)
  • [3] LIU Hongmin, YANG Yandong, User innovation and the incentive mechanism of collaborative innovation of IURU, Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 7, pp. 31-34, (2017)
  • [4] KANKANHALLI A, HUA Y., User service innovation on mobile phone platforms: investigating impacts of lead userness, toolkit support, and design autonomy, MIS Quarterly, 42, 1, pp. 165-187, (2017)
  • [5] HIENERTH C., The commercialization of user innovations: the development of the rodeo kayak industry, R&D Management, 36, 3, pp. 273-294, (2006)
  • [6] HUANG Yanghua, LYU Tie, Market demand and the evolution of emerging industry-a microeconomic analysis of user innovation, Journal of Renmin University of China, 27, 3, pp. 54-62, (2013)
  • [7] ZHANG Zhengang, CHEN Zhiming, LI Yunjian, A study on the relationship between open innovation, absorptive capacity and firm's innovation performance, Science Research Management, 36, 3, pp. 49-56, (2015)
  • [8] YU Feifei, YAN Lei, The innovation effect of user innovation in the innovation community and improvement strategy: a study of Haier open innovation platform, Science of Science and Management of S.&T, 38, 2, pp. 55-67, (2017)
  • [9] ZHENG Tongtong, XIE Kefan, An analysis of evolutionary game on the behavior of user innovation, Industrial Engineering Journal, 17, 3, pp. 6-12, (2014)
  • [10] YOO S H, KIM D S, PARK M S., Pricing and return policy under various supply contracts in a closed-loop supply chain, International Journal of Production Research, 53, 1, pp. 106-126, (2015)