Using mixed methods and partnership to develop a program evaluation toolkit for organizations that provide physical activity programs for persons with disabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Sarah V. C. Lawrason [1 ]
Pinder DaSilva [2 ]
Emilie Michalovic [3 ]
Amy Latimer-Cheung [3 ]
Jennifer R. Tomasone [4 ]
Shane Sweet [5 ]
Tanya Forneris [4 ]
Jennifer Leo [5 ]
Matthew Greenwood [6 ]
Janine Giles [7 ]
Jane Arkell [1 ]
Jackie Patatas [8 ]
Nick Boyle [9 ]
Nathan Adams [10 ]
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis [11 ]
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,School of Health and Exercise Sciences
[2] International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries,School of Kinesiology and Health Studies
[3] Abilities Centre,Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education
[4] Queen’s University,The Steadward Centre for Personal and Physical Achievement
[5] Revved Up,Department of Medicine
[6] McGill University,undefined
[7] Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR),undefined
[8] University of Alberta,undefined
[9] Pickering Football Club,undefined
[10] Rocky Mountain Adaptive,undefined
[11] Active Living Alliance,undefined
[12] BC Wheelchair Sports Association,undefined
[13] University of British Columbia,undefined
关键词
Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Delphi technique;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-024-00618-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Organizations that provide sport and exercise programming for people with disabilities need to evaluate their programs to understand what works, secure funding, and make improvements. However, these programs can be difficult to evaluate due to lack of evidence-informed tools, low capacity, and few resources (e.g., money, time). For this project, we aimed to close the evaluation gap by creating an online, evidence-informed toolkit that helps organizations evaluate physical activity programs for individuals with disabilities. The toolkit development process was guided by a community-university partnership and used a systematic four-step approach. Step one included reviewing the literature and building consensus among partners and potential users about indicators related to the success of community-based programs. Step two involved linking indicators with at least one measure for assessment. Step three involved interviews with partners who provided several recommendations for the online toolkit. Step four included the co-creation of a collaborative plan to distribute the toolkit for academic and non-academic audiences. Our comprehensive toolkit includes indicators for the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of physical activity programs for individuals with disabilities. This paper provides a template for making toolkits in partnership with research users, offers strategies for community-university partnerships, and resulted in the co-creation of an evidence-informed evaluation resource to physical activity organizations. Users can find the toolkit at et.cdpp.ca.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Using health promotion guidelines for persons with disabilities to crossMark develop and evaluate a physical activity program for individuals with multiple sclerosis: A feasibility study
    Dixon-Ibarra, Alicia
    Nery-Hurwit, Mara
    Driver, Simon
    MacDonald, Megan
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2017, 61 : 150 - 159
  • [2] Park-based physical activity interventions for persons with disabilities: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Saitta, Miles
    Devan, Hemakumar
    Boland, Pauline
    Perry, Meredith A.
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 12 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [3] Development of a functional and psychosocial evaluation toolkit using mixed methodology in a community-based physical activity program for childhood cancer survivors
    Shank, Jena
    Chamorro-Vina, Carolina
    Guilcher, Gregory M. T.
    Schulte, Fiona
    Culos-Reed, S. Nicole
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (10) : 8101 - 8110
  • [4] Development of a functional and psychosocial evaluation toolkit using mixed methodology in a community-based physical activity program for childhood cancer survivors
    Jena Shank
    Carolina Chamorro-Viña
    Gregory M. T. Guilcher
    Fiona Schulte
    S. Nicole Culos-Reed
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 8101 - 8110
  • [5] Utilising telehealth to support exercise and physical activity in people with Parkinson disease: a program evaluation using mixed methods
    Flynn, Allyson
    Preston, Elisabeth
    Dennis, Sarah
    Canning, Colleen G.
    Allen, Natalie E. E.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] Utilising telehealth to support exercise and physical activity in people with Parkinson disease: a program evaluation using mixed methods
    Allyson Flynn
    Elisabeth Preston
    Sarah Dennis
    Colleen G. Canning
    Natalie E. Allen
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [7] A mixed-methods evaluation of a community physical activity program for breast cancer survivors
    Catherine M. Sabiston
    Angela J. Fong
    Erin K. O’Loughlin
    Sarkis Meterissian
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 17
  • [8] A mixed-methods evaluation of a community physical activity program for breast cancer survivors
    Sabiston, Catherine M.
    Fong, Angela J.
    O'Loughlin, Erin K.
    Meterissian, Sarkis
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [9] Context matters: Using mixed methods timelines to provide an accessible and integrated visual for complex program evaluation data
    Newton-Levinson, Anna
    Higdon, Megan
    Sales, Jessica
    Gaydos, Laurie
    Rochat, Roger
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2020, 80
  • [10] The Physical Activity at Work (PAW) Program in Thai Office Workers: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Study
    Akksilp, Katika
    Rouyard, Thomas
    Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
    Nakamura, Ryota
    Mueller-Riemenschneide, Falk
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Chen, Cynthia
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2025, 9