The Spillover-Feedback Effect of Agricultural Sector’s Environmental Footprints Interregional Transfer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Hu J. [1 ,2 ]
Huang K. [1 ]
Chen Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
[2] Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai
关键词
agricultural sector; China; environmental footprint; spillover-feedback effect;
D O I
10.13209/j.0479-8023.2022.061
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study takes seven regional agricultural sectors in China as the research object, and introduces water footprint (WF), carbon footprint (CF) and land footprint (LF) to analyze the spillover-feedback effect of these environmental footprints to characterize their resource and environment impacts. Based on the inter-regional input-output model, this paper first decomposed the spillover-feedback effects model, extended it to the environmental field, constructed the spillover-feedback effects model coupled with environmental footprints, and evaluated the transfer of resource and environment pressure in the agricultural sector from the perspective of interregional two-way impacts. The results show that the spillover effects and feedback effects of WF, CF and LF in seven regions of China’s agriculture sectors varied greatly in spatial level in 2007‒2012. The feedback effects of WF, CF, and LF were more significant and should not be ignored. Through further analysis of the ratio of feedback effect to spillover effect of each region’s Agricultural Sector, it was found that the ratio of feedback effect to spillover effect of North (NO) region’s agricultural sector was the largest, all more than 31.3%. The ratio of feedback effect to spillover effect of East (EA), South (SO) and Central South (CS) regions’ Agricultural Sectors were also larger, all more than 10.7%. Finally, it was pointed out that the current interregional available resources in China’s Agriculture Sector did not match the demand and the level of regional economic development, so to some extent, the current trade structure should be improved to support agricultural sustainable development. © 2022 Peking University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 710
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] (2018)
  • [2] Le Quere C, Andrew R M, Friedlingstein P, Et al., Global carbon budget 2018, Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss, pp. 2142-2194, (2018)
  • [3] Vermeulen S J, Campbell B M, Ingram J S I., Climate change and food systems, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 37, pp. 195-222, (2012)
  • [4] Yu Y, Hubacek K, Feng K S, Et al., Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK, Ecological Economics, 69, 5, pp. 1140-1147, (2010)
  • [5] Vanham D, Bidoglio G., The water footprint of Milan, Water Science & Technology, 69, 4, pp. 789-795, (2014)
  • [6] Bellarby J, Foereid B, Hastings A, Et al., Cool farming: climate impacts of agriculture and mitigation potential, (2008)
  • [7] Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Et al., Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change, (2014)
  • [8] Hammond G., Time to give due weight to the ‘carbon footprint’ issue, Nature, 445, (2007)
  • [9] Wang Z Y, Huang K, Yang S S, Et al., An input-output approach to evaluate the water footprint and virtual water trade of Beijing, China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, pp. 172-179, (2013)
  • [10] Hu J R, Huang K, Ridoutt B G, Et al., Rethinking environmental stress from the perspective of an integrated environmental footprint: application in the Beijing industry sector, Science of the Total Environment, 637, 638, pp. 1051-1060, (2018)