Influence of obstacles on shock wave propagation of gas explosion

被引:0
|
作者
Jing G. [1 ,2 ]
Sun Y. [1 ]
Ban T. [1 ]
Peng L. [1 ]
He X. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Jiaozuo
[2] Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang
关键词
Blocking plate; Explosion pressure; Fluent simulation; Gas explosion; Non-flame area;
D O I
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.1205
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to study the influence of non-flame area blocking plate on gas explosion pressure in different positions in the pipeline, an 18 m long arch pipe test platform was established, besides, based on FLUENT software, the gas explosion pressure and flame change at 6.75 m and 11.25 m positions without blocking plate and with 0.2 blocking rate in non-flame area were simulated and analyzed.This paper studies the change of the gas explosion pressure peak value at different measuring points by the blocking plate in the non-flame area, qualitatively analyzes the influence law of the three blocking rates on the pressure peak value at 6.75 m, and analyzes the action mechanism of the blocking plate on the gas explosion in the non-flame area.The results show that under the condition of no blocking plate, the peak pressure of each measuring point in the pipeline increases first, then decreases and then increases with the increase of distance, and the peak pressure at 11.25 m is greater than that at 6.75 m.When the blocking plate is added in the non-flame area, the maximum pressure in the pipeline appears ahead of time to 6.5 m due to the joint action of shock wave and reflected wave.When the blocking plate with blocking ratio of 0.2 is increased, the pressure peak at 6.75 m in the pipeline is increased.When the blocking ratio is 0.6, the flame propagation of gas explosion is restrained by reflected waves.Compared with 0.2 and 0.4 blocking rates, the maximum pressure in the pipeline decreases obviously.The peak pressure of gas explosion at 6.75 m increases first and then decreases with the increase of blocking ratio.When ignition occurs at 0.25 m, two reaction groups appear in the pipeline, the gas mass after 0.25 m has a great influence on the explosion pressure, and the reaction speed at 0-0.25 m is slow.Due to the limitation of pipe shape and ignition position, the flame propagation speed at the lower end of arch pipe is faster, and the blocking plate with 0.2 blocking rate is added.The simulation results show that the flame contraction time point is 15 ms ahead of time, and the pressure drop trend at No.4 and No.7 measuring points becomes slow.In the simulation results, the pressure changes obviously after the blocking plate, and the influence of the simulated shock wave reflection on the flame is limited. © 2021, Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] (2005)
  • [2] JIA Zhiwei, JING Guoxun, CHENG Lei, Et al., Study on propagation rules about gas explosion shock wave in the laneway with abrupt change of sectional area, China Safety Science Journal, 17, 12, pp. 92-94, (2007)
  • [3] JING Guoxun, DUAN Zhenwei, CHENG Lei, Et al., Research progress in explosion characteristics and spread law of gas and coal dust, China Safety Science Journal, 19, 4, pp. 71-76, (2009)
  • [4] JIA Zhiwei, XU Shengming, JING Guoxun, Experimental study on propagation law of gas explosion shock wave in one-way bifurcated pipeline, China Safety Science Journal, 25, 12, pp. 51-55, (2015)
  • [5] WANG Kai, ZHOU Aitao, WEI Gaoju, Et al., Influence of roadway cross-section variation on outburst shock wave propagation, Journal of China Coal Society, 37, 6, pp. 989-993, (2012)
  • [6] XU Jingde, The study on gas explosion wave propagation law and affected factors in mine, (2003)
  • [7] XU Jingde, YANG Gengyu, Numerical simulation of barrier excitation effect during gas explosion propagation, China Safety Science Journal, 13, 11, pp. 42-44, (2003)
  • [8] MOEN I O, LEE J H S., Pressure development due to turbulent flame propagation in large-scale methane-air explosions, Combustion and Flame, 47, pp. 31-52, (1982)
  • [9] HE Xueqiu, YANG Yi, WANG Enyuan, Et al., Effects of obstacle on premixed flame microstructure and flame propagation in methane/air explosion, Journal of China Coal Society, 29, 2, pp. 60-63, (2004)
  • [10] YU Lixin, YOU Han, SHENG Hongzhi, Et al., Influence of obstacle configurations on overpressure development inpremixed flame, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 24, 3, pp. 537-539, (2003)