Airfoil optimization design based on Gaussian process regression and genetic algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Chang L. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Q. [1 ,2 ]
Guo X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai
[2] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai
来源
关键词
Airfoil design; Bayesian optimization; CST parameterization method; Gaussian process regression(GPR); Genetic algorithm;
D O I
10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20200402
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In view of the problems that the leading edge curvature of the wind turbine airfoil with high lift⁃to⁃drag ratio has large radius, the traditional airfoil parameterization method has insufficient leading edge control ability, and there exists poor prediction accuracy based on the panel method XFOIL, an enhanced class function/shape function transformation (CST) parameterized method was used to control the shape change of airfoil, Latin hypercube experimental design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow field calculation module, Gaussian process regression model and genetic algorithm, based on high⁃confidence Reynolds average Navier ⁃Stocks (RANS) and Gaussian regression model⁃assisted genetic algorithm for airfoil optimization design method.The results showed that the airfoil optimization method based on the Gaussian regression model can reduce the number of CFD calculations for optimization by one order, thereby greatly improving the optimization design efficiency.The resistance reduction design of the supercritical airfoil RAE2822 of the standard calculation example showed that the resistance of the CFD frequency in the order of hundreds of times was reduced by 43.16%, the shock wave was weakened and the lift, moment and area could strictly meet the constraints.The maximum lift⁃to⁃drag ratio of the wind turbine airfoil NACA64618 showed that the designed airfoil not only greatly increased the lift⁃to⁃drag ratio at the design angle of attack and the secondary design angle of attack, but also improved its aerodynamic performance in the entire range of the small angle of attack.And there were two main design points, without bad resistance. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Aerospace Power. All right reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2306 / 2316
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] AN Qimeng, HUANG Diangui, WU Guoqing, Improved design of a S809 airfoil based on variable⁃domain variational finite element method, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 32, 5, pp. 779-782, (2011)
  • [2] HE Lei, QIAN Weiqi, LIU Tao, Et al., Inverse design method of airfoil based deep learning, Journal of Aerospace Power, 35, 9, pp. 1909-1917, (2020)
  • [3] RITLOP R, NADARAJAH S., Design of wind turbine profiles via a preconditioned adjoint⁃based aerodynamic shape optimization, AIAA 2009⁃1547, (2009)
  • [4] BAI Jingyan, YANG Ke, LI Hongli, Et al., Design of the horizontal axis wind turbine airfoil family, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 31, 4, pp. 589-592, (2010)
  • [5] CHEN Jin, ZHANG Shiqiang, WANG Xudong, Et al., Dedicated wind turbine airfoil design based on the rougness sensitivity considerations, Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 29, 2, pp. 142-149, (2011)
  • [6] WANG Quan, WANG Jun, CHEN Jin, Et al., Wind turbine airfoil optimal design based on a multipoint angle of attack, Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 37, 11, pp. 1580-1585, (2016)
  • [7] BARRETT R, NING A., Comparison of airfoil precomputational analysis methods for optimization of wind turbine blades[J], IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 7, 3, pp. 1081-1088, (2016)
  • [8] MIN Xinyong, Aerodynamics simulation and optimal design of wind turbine airfoil, (2010)
  • [9] YU Li, HU Zhengkui, CHENG Han, Et al., Multidisciplinary design optimization for wind turbine airfoil, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 43, 5, pp. 697-700, (2011)
  • [10] JU Yaping, ZHANG Chuhua, Artificial neural network model of airfoil aerodynamic performance using design of experiments, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 31, 5, pp. 893-898, (2010)