Transcranial magnetic stimulation over supramarginal gyrus stimulates primary motor cortex directly and impairs manual dexterity: implications for TMS focality

被引:1
|
作者
Holmes, Nicholas P. [1 ,2 ]
Di Chiaro, Nunzia Valentina [2 ]
Crowe, Emily M. [2 ]
Marson, Ben [2 ]
Gobel, Karen [2 ]
Gaigalas, Dominykas [1 ]
Jay, Talia [2 ]
Lockett, Abigail V. [2 ]
Powell, Eleanor S. [2 ]
Zeni, Silvia [2 ]
Reader, Arran T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Stirling, Dept Psychol, Stirling, Scotland
关键词
corticospinal excitability; manual dexterity; mapping; movement; pegboard; CORTICAL CONNECTIONS; PARIETAL; ORGANIZATION; OBJECTS; SULCUS; BRAIN; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00369.2023
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Based on human motor cortex, the effective spatial resolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as 5-20 mm, because small changes in TMS coil position can have large effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs are often studied at rest, with muscles relaxed. During muscle contraction and movement, corticospinal excitability is higher, thresholds for effective stimulation are lower, and MEPs can be evoked from larger regions of scalp, so the effective spatial resolution of TMS is larger. We found that TMS over the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) impaired manual dexterity in the grooved pegboard task. It also resulted in short-latency MEPs in hand muscles, despite the coil being 55 mm away from the motor cortex hand area (M1). MEPs might be evoked by either a specific corticospinal connection from SMG or a remote but direct electromagnetic stimulation of M1. To distinguish these alternatives, we mapped MEPs across the scalp during rest, isotonic contraction, and manual dexterity tasks and ran electric field simulations to model the expected M1 activation from 27 scalp locations and four coil orientations. We also systematically reviewed studies using TMS during movement. Across five experiments, TMS over SMG reliably evoked MEPs during hand movement. These MEPs were consistent with direct M1 stimulation and substantially decreased corticospinal thresholds during natural movement. Systematic review suggested that 54 published experiments may have suffered from similar motor activation confounds. Our results have implications for the assumed spatial resolution of TMS, and especially when TMS is presented within 55 mm of the motor cortex. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as having an effective spatial resolution of similar to 10 mm, because of the limited area of the scalp on which TMS produces motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in resting muscles. We find that during natural hand movement TMS evokes MEPs from a much larger scalp area, in particular when stimulating over the supramarginal gyrus 55 mm away. Our results show that TMS can be effective at much larger distances than generally assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 378
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the Supramarginal Gyrus: A Window to Perception of Upright
    Kheradmand, Amir
    Lasker, Adrian
    Zee, David S.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2015, 25 (03) : 765 - 771
  • [2] Modulating Brain Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex: A Concurrent TMS/fMRI Study
    Jung, JeYoung
    Bungert, Andreas
    Bowtell, Richard
    Jackson, Stephen R.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [3] The role of primary motor cortex in manual inhibition of return: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study
    Bek, Judith
    Constable, Merryn D.
    Hilchey, Matthew
    Welsh, Timothy N.
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 445
  • [4] Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human frontal cortex: implications for repetitive TMS treatment of depression
    Paus, T
    Barrett, J
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 29 (04): : 268 - 279
  • [5] Transcranial static magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex alters sequential implicit motor learning
    Nojima, Ippei
    Watanabe, Tatsunori
    Gyoda, Tomoya
    Sugata, Hisato
    Ikeda, Takashi
    Mima, Tatsuya
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 696 : 33 - 37
  • [6] Somatosensory and transcranial direct current stimulation effects on manual dexterity and motor cortex function: A metaplasticity study
    Trudgen, Anita
    Cirillo, John
    Byblow, Winston D.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (04) : 938 - 947
  • [7] Suppression of Electromyogram of Hand Muscle Elicited by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex
    Odagaki, Masato
    Ohishi, Sanae
    Fukuda, Hiroshi
    Hiwaki, Osamu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2008, 44 (11) : 4545 - 4548
  • [8] Hand perceptions induced by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex
    Franza, Matteo
    Sorrentino, Giuliana
    Vissani, Matteo
    Serino, Andrea
    Blanke, Olaf
    Bassolino, Michela
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (03) : 693 - 701
  • [9] Personality traits are correlated with motor cortex excitability: A transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study
    Nguyen, M
    Greenberg, BD
    Murphy, DL
    Smith, MJ
    Wasserman, EM
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 47 (08) : 142S - 142S
  • [10] Neurophysiologic markers of primary motor cortex for laryngeal muscles and premotor cortex in caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus investigated in motor speech disorder: a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study
    Maja Rogić Vidaković
    Ana Jerković
    Tomislav Jurić
    Igor Vujović
    Joško Šoda
    Nikola Erceg
    Andreja Bubić
    Marina Zmajević Schönwald
    Pantelis Lioumis
    Dragan Gabelica
    Zoran Đogaš
    Cognitive Processing, 2016, 17 : 429 - 442