Single-Stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy Versus TwoStage Endoscopic Stone Extraction Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patients With Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review

Gallbladder stones with common bile duct (CBD) stones can be managed by a single -stage laparoscopic approach with transcystic or transcholedochal CBD exploration and cholecystectomy or a two -stage approach with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comparative outcomes between these approaches remain controversial. The objective was to compare single -stage laparoscopic CBD exploration and cholecystectomy versus two -stage ERCP stone removal followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for clearance of CBD stones, complications, length of stay, and costs. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized trials and observational studies comparing outcomes of interest between single and two -stage approaches. Meta -analyses using random effects models were conducted. Seven studies with 382 patients were included. The single -stage approach achieved higher stone clearance rates (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.12-2.08) with a shorter length of stay (mean duration: 3.5 days, 95% CI: -5.1 to -1.9 days) compared to the two -stage method. No significant difference was seen in complication rates (45% vs 40%, p=0.43) or costs ($19,000 vs $18,000, p=0.34). For patients with gallbladder and CBD stones, singlestage laparoscopic CBD exploration with cholecystectomy appears superior for stone clearance while comparable in safety and cost to a two -stage approach. Further randomized trials are warranted.