Identifying Academic Expertise of Researchers Based on Iceberg Model

被引:0
|
作者
Song P. [1 ]
Long C. [1 ]
Li Y. [1 ]
Ni X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Management School, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin
关键词
Expertise Identification; Iceberg Model; Peer-Relative Index; Portrait of Talent; Self-Focus Index;
D O I
10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0542
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
[Objective] This paper aims to automatically identify the academic expertise of researchers, which improves the research project evaluation and talent assessment. [Methods] Firstly, we adopted the Iceberg Model to describe the academic expertise of researchers. The visible part of the“iceberg”reveals the researchers’areas of expertise and specialization, which identify their core competencies and main research directions. The lower part of the“iceberg”indicates the“comparative advantages”of researchers’expertise. Then, we used labels to represent researchers’expertise and utilized machine learning techniques such as LDA and BERT to extract, cluster, and generate matrices of academic labels. Finally, we proposed the self-focus and the peer-relative indexes to identify the researchers’main areas and relative position in the scientific community. [Results] Using a sample of 20 researchers, we generated 8,985 sets of label words and their weights and described researchers’expertise at a fine-grained level. And then, the“Self-Focus Index”and the“Peer-relative Index”were calculated based on the domain-researcher matrix (40×20). We found the proposed method can accurately reflect researchers’expertise in specific research areas and relative positions within the scientific community. [Limitations] Future work should consider incorporating the temporal factor to capture the temporal evolution characteristics of researchers’ academic expertise. [Conclusions] The advantages of the proposed method are twofold. Firstly, the iceberg model effectively explains what researchers do and how well they do it. The model provides a theoretical basis for label extraction, index design, and enhancing interpretability. Secondly, in addition to quantifiable comparative expertise index calculations, the method achieves fine-grained, precise, and dynamic talent expertise profiling. © 2023 Chinese Medical Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Xiong Huixiang, Ye Jiaxin, Ding Ling, Et al., Scholar Evaluation Research Based on an Improved h-Index, Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 38, 10, pp. 1022-1029, (2019)
  • [2] Wang Lin, Pan Chenyi, Zhu Wenjing, Comparative Research on the Evaluation of Microblogs’Impact Based on h-Index, g-Index and p-Index, Journal of Modern Information, 38, 6, pp. 11-18, (2018)
  • [3] Sui Guiling, Theoretical and Empirical Research on the Comparison of Academic Influence Evaluation of p-Index and h-Index, Journal of Intelligence, 39, 4, pp. 153-160, (2020)
  • [4] Song Peiyan, Cheng Zhiqiang, Method of Experts Academic Influence Evaluation in the Field of Oncology: An Empirical Study, Technology Intelligence Engineering, 4, 3, pp. 48-57, (2018)
  • [5] Yuan Guohua, Kou Jingjing, Zhang Jianyong, Et al., The Research of Scholar Influence Evaluation Based on Open Peer Review: Take the F1000 as an Example, Library and Information Service, 62, 13, pp. 37-44, (2018)
  • [6] Wang Yan, Wei Ruibin, To Build the Expert Academic Network Based on the Multi-data Source, Journal of Intelligence, 35, 12, pp. 121-126, (2016)
  • [7] McClelland D C., Testing for Competence Rather Than for Intelligence, American Psychologist, 28, 1, pp. 1-14, (1973)
  • [8] Xu Zengxulin, Xie Jing, Yu Qianqian, Research on Design Method of Multi-Evaluation Model for Talents, Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 5, 8, pp. 122-131, (2021)
  • [9] Song Xueyan, Li Ximeng, Deng Jun, Research on Competency Model of Archival Document Compilers in the Digital Age, Library and Information Service, 64, 3, pp. 32-41, (2020)
  • [10] Zou Kai, Xu Pingping, Guo Yihang, Et al., Construction of Competency Model of Information Management Talents in Universities under the Background of Big Data, Information Studies: Theory & Application, 44, 12, pp. 55-64, (2021)