Evolution and Influencing Factors of Spatial Correlation Network of Construction Carbon Emission in China from the Perspective of Whole Life Cycle

被引:0
|
作者
Ren X.-S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li Z.-R. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Management Science and Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan
[2] School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
[3] Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2024年 / 45卷 / 03期
关键词
construction industry carbon emissions; quadratic assignment program; social network analysis; spatial correlation; the gravity model;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202303043
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the whole life cycle perspective,the carbon emissions of the provincial construction industry in China from 2011 to 2019 were calculated from the production, construction,operation,and demolition stages of building materials. A spatial correlation network matrix of the carbon emissions in the construction industry was constructed by using the modified gravity model,and the structural characteristics of the correlation network were described by introducing social network analysis. Through the quadratic assignment program,the spatial correlation matrix of carbon emissions in the construction industry and its influencing factors were regressed and analyzed. The conclusions were as follows: ① the spatial correlation network of carbon emissions in Chinaś construction industry clearly existed. The network density and network correlation numbers were gradually rising, and the network tightness and stability were gradually improving. ② Shanghai,Tianjin,Beijing,and Jiangsu had a higher degree centrality and closeness centrality,which are the core and dominant positions of the spatial correlation network of carbon emissions in the construction industry. Zhejiang replaced Shanghai in the top four from 2013 to 2018,and the betweenness centrality of each province had unbalanced characteristics. ③ Beijing,Tianjin,Jiangsu,Inner Mongolia,Shanghai,and Shandong were“net beneficiaries”blocks, receiving the carbon emissions from other regions. Four provinces,Guangdong,Chongqing,Fujian,and Shandong,belonged to the“broker”sector,achieving a dynamic balance between the production and consumption sides of building carbon emissions. The remaining 20 provinces played a“net spillovers”role,actively sending carbon emissions from the construction industry to other provinces. The correlation between blocks was much greater than the correlation relationship within the blocks. ④ Industrial structure,urban population,spatial adjacency,consumption level,and construction industry process structure had a significant influence on the spatial correlation of carbon emissions in the construction industry. The greater the inter-provincial differences in industrial structure,urban population,spatial adjacency,and consumption level,the greater the similarity of inter-provincial construction industry process structure,and the stronger the spatial correlation and spatial spillover of the construction industry carbon emissions. Finally,according to the evolution characteristics and influencing factors of the spatial correlation network of building carbon emissions,relevant countermeasures and suggestions were provided for the collaborative carbon reduction development of the construction industry region. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1253
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Huang L Z, Krigsvoll G, Johansen F, Et al., Carbon emission of global construction sector[J], Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, pp. 1906-1916, (2018)
  • [2] Li D Z, Huang G Y, Zhu S Y, Et al., How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, (2021)
  • [3] Feng B, Wang X Q., Research on carbon decoupling effect and influence factors of provincial construction industry in China, China Population,Resources and Environment, 25, 4, pp. 28-34, (2015)
  • [4] Shen L Y, Zhu M C, Wu Y, Et al., Measurement on carbon emissions efficiency of residential building, Urban Problems, 10, pp. 53-62, (2019)
  • [5] Zhou Y X, Liu W L, Lv X Y, Et al., Investigating interior driving factors and cross-industrial linkages of carbon emission efficiency in China's construction industry:based on Super-SBM DEA and GVAR model [J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, (2019)
  • [6] Bai J, Qu J S., Investigating the spatiotemporal variability and driving factors of China's building embodied carbon emissions, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 15, pp. 19186-19201, (2021)
  • [7] Zhao Y, Liu L, Yu M., Comparison and analysis of carbon emissions of traditional, prefabricated, and green material buildings in materialization stage [J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, (2023)
  • [8] Huo T F, Ma Y L, Xu L B, Et al., Carbon emissions in China's urban residential building sector through 2060:a dynamic scenario simulation, Energy, 254, (2022)
  • [9] Hu Y, Zhu D J., Disconnect analysis between CO<sub>2</sub> emission output value and energy consumption of China construction, China Population,Resources and Environment, 25, 8, pp. 50-57, (2015)
  • [10] Su Y Q, Zou Z J, Ma X M, Et al., Understanding the relationships between the development of the construction sector, carbon emissions,and economic growth in China:supply-chain level analysis based on the structural production layer difference approach[J], Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, pp. 730-743, (2022)