Crop water production function based on gene expression programming

被引:0
|
作者
Jiachao G. [1 ,2 ]
Yue L. [1 ,2 ]
Dongyang R. [1 ,2 ]
Rong W. [1 ,2 ]
Yijie C. [1 ]
Guanhua H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing
[2] Center for Agricultural Water Research in China, China Agricultural University, Beijing
关键词
gene expression programming; numerical analysis; salinity; soils; water production function; water-salt stress;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.07.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A crop water production function has been one of the most significant parameters to improve the use efficiency of agricultural water in irrigation districts. A quantitative relationship between agricultural hydrological elements and yield can be established for the influence of the agricultural hydrological process on crop growth. However, the determination of parameters in the water production function requires a great deal of field experimental data in the water- salt stress gradient treatment. At the same time, there is the complex response of crop yield to the water-salt dynamic processes with the water production function. Therefore, it is necessary to construct the water production functions for the quantitative influence of hydrological factors on the crop yield using soil water-salt dynamic processes. In this study, the new crop water production function was established to integrate the Agro-Hydrological & chemical and Crop systems simulator (AHC) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP), particularly for the water saving and higher yield. The main crops were taken as the research objects, including maize, sunflower, and wheat, which were widely planted in the Hetao Irrigation District. The AHC was selected to simulate the agro-hydrological process and crop growth under different scenarios. Simulation results were used as the input data of the GEP algorithm. Subsequently, the optimal input factor combination was determined to compare the evaluation indexes of the generated data from the GEP algorithm. As such, the crop water production functions were established. Results showed that the optimal input combinations included the groundwater depth, irrigation amount, evapotranspiration (ET), total dissolved solids of groundwater, salt stress, and water content in the root zone soil. Specifically, the sensitive environmental factors varied greatly in the different crop yields. The maize yield was related to the groundwater depth, salt stress in the sowing- jointing stage and the filling-harvest stage, and the soil water content in the jointing-trumpet stage and the trumpet- tasseling stage. The sunflower yield was closely related to the groundwater depth, evapotranspiration, and the salt stress in the sowing-seedling stage, the seedling-budding stage, and the flowering-filling stage, while the soil water content in the budding-flowering stage and the filling-harvest stage. The wheat yield was related to the evapotranspiration, and salt stress in the jointing- heading stage, while the soil water content in the filling-harvest stage. Furthermore, the groundwater was the main water supply source during the maize growth period, when the maize was less resistant to the salt. By contrast, the less irrigation amount resulted in the soil salt accumulation and the salt stress in the initial and end stage of maize growth. Correspondingly, the effect of groundwater on the sunflower yield was similar to the maize, whereas, the sunflower yield was affected by the evapotranspiration, which was related to the dry aboveground biomass accumulation and yield. In addition, the effect of evaporation on the wheat yield was consistent with the effect on sunflower yield. The excessive salt accumulation and water deficit were reduced the wheat yield during the jointing-heading stage and the filling-harvest stage, which were the main growth periods. Meanwhile, the crop yield (predicted yield) was estimated under different irrigation quantities using the crop water production function. The determination of coefficient values between the predicted yields of maize, sunflower, and wheat and their simulated ones by AHC were 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively, and the mean relative errors were both less than 5%. Therefore, the water production function can be used to accurately estimate the crop yield under the salinity stress. The finding can provide strong references for agricultural water saving and efficient use of irrigation water. © 2022 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 109
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Chen Yaxin, Wei Zhanmin, Shi Haibin, Et al., Evaluation of crop-water-salt stress and response model researches, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 22, 3, pp. 1-6, (2003)
  • [2] Li Yunyun, Chang Jianxia, Fan Jingjing, Et al., Agricultural drought evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms in the Yellow River Basin under climate and land use changes, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 37, 19, pp. 84-93, (2021)
  • [3] Li Mo, Cao Kaihua, Fu Qiang, Et al., Efficient allocation of multiple water sources in irrigation areas considering water cycle process under uncertainty, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 37, 18, pp. 62-73, (2021)
  • [4] Cheng W G, Lu W X, Xin X, Et al., Adaptability of various models of the water production function for rice in Jilin Province, China, Paddy and Water Environment, 14, 2, pp. 355-365, (2016)
  • [5] Moberly J T, Aiken R M, Lin X M, Et al., Crop water production functions of grain sorghum and winter wheat in Kansas and Texas, Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 162, 1, pp. 42-60, (2017)
  • [6] Foster T, Brozovic N., Simulating crop-water production functions using crop growth models to support water policy assessments, Ecological Economics, 152, pp. 9-21, (2018)
  • [7] Sima N Q, Andales A A, Harmel R D, Et al., Evaluating RZWQM2-CERES-Maize and water production functions for predicting irrigated maize yield and biomass in eastern Colorado, Transactions of the ASABE, 62, 1, pp. 213-223, (2019)
  • [8] Pushpalatha R, Amma S S, George J, Et al., Development of optimal irrigation schedules and crop water production function for cassava: Study over three major growing areas in India, Irrigation Science, 38, 3, pp. 251-261, (2020)
  • [9] Zhang B B, Feng G, Ahuja L R, Et al., Soybean crop-water production functions in a humid region across years and soils determined with APEX model, Agricultural Water Management, 204, pp. 180-191, (2018)
  • [10] Araya A, Prasad P V V, Gowda P H, Et al., Yield and water productivity of winter wheat under various irrigation capacities, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 55, 1, pp. 24-37, (2019)