AI Through Ethical Lenses: A Discourse Analysis of Guidelines for AI in Healthcare

被引:2
|
作者
Arbelaez Ossa, Laura [1 ]
Milford, Stephen R. [1 ]
Rost, Michael [1 ]
Leist, Anja K. [2 ]
Shaw, David M. [1 ,3 ]
Elger, Bernice S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Luxembourg, Inst Res Socio Econ Inequal IRSEI, Dept Social Sci, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[3] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Geneva, Univ Ctr Legal Med CURML, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Healthcare; AI guidelines; Guidelines; Ethics; AI ethics; Regulatory affairs; Regulations;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-024-00486-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While the technologies that enable Artificial Intelligence (AI) continue to advance rapidly, there are increasing promises regarding AI's beneficial outputs and concerns about the challenges of human-computer interaction in healthcare. To address these concerns, institutions have increasingly resorted to publishing AI guidelines for healthcare, aiming to align AI with ethical practices. However, guidelines as a form of written language can be analyzed to recognize the reciprocal links between its textual communication and underlying societal ideas. From this perspective, we conducted a discourse analysis to understand how these guidelines construct, articulate, and frame ethics for AI in healthcare. We included eight guidelines and identified three prevalent and interwoven discourses: (1) AI is unavoidable and desirable; (2) AI needs to be guided with (some forms of) principles (3) trust in AI is instrumental and primary. These discourses signal an over-spillage of technical ideals to AI ethics, such as over-optimism and resulting hyper-criticism. This research provides insights into the underlying ideas present in AI guidelines and how guidelines influence the practice and alignment of AI with ethical, legal, and societal values expected to shape AI in healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How empty is Trustworthy AI? A discourse analysis of the Ethics Guidelines of Trustworthy AI
    Stamboliev, Eugenia
    Christiaens, Tim
    CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2025, 19 (01) : 39 - 56
  • [2] Ethical issues of digital and AI in healthcare
    Kirchner, Claude
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2025, 209 (01): : 57 - 61
  • [3] AI in Healthcare: Ethical and Privacy Challenges
    Bartoletti, Ivana
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, AIME 2019, 2019, 11526 : 7 - 10
  • [4] Against Ethical AI Guidelines and Self Interest
    McMillan, Donald
    Brown, Barry
    HALFWAY TO THE FUTURE SYMPOSIUM (HTTF 2019), 2019,
  • [5] Ethical Considerations for AI Use in Healthcare Research
    SeyedAlinaghi, Seyedahmad
    Habibi, Pedram
    Mehraeen, Esmaeil
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (03) : 286 - 289
  • [6] Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review
    Elendu, Chukwuka
    Amaechi, Dependable C.
    Elendu, Tochi C.
    Jingwa, Klein A.
    Okoye, Osinachi K.
    John Okah, Minichimso
    Ladele, John A.
    Farah, Abdirahman H.
    Alimi, Hameed A.
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (50) : E36671
  • [7] Ethical Guidelines for Solving Ethical Issues and Developing AI Systems
    Balasubramaniam, Nagadivya
    Kauppinen, Marjo
    Kujala, Sari
    Hiekkanen, Kari
    PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (PROFES 2020), 2020, 12562 : 331 - 346
  • [8] Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI in Healthcare: Insights From a Content Analysis
    Wu, Yin
    Liu, Xiang Michelle
    IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2023, 42 (03) : 76 - 87
  • [9] Talking Past Each Other? Navigating discourse on Ethical AI: Comparing the discourse on ethical AI policy by Big Tech companies and EU policymakers Comparing the discourse on ethical AI policy by Big Tech companies and EU policymakers
    Evers, Cornelia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, ACM FACCT 2024, 2024, : 1885 - 1896
  • [10] Generative AI and Ethical Analysis
    Mcmillan, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (10): : 42 - 44