A stratified Bayesian decision-making model for occupational risk assessment of production facilities

被引:1
|
作者
Gul, Muhammet [1 ]
Yucesan, Melih [2 ]
Karci, Coskun [3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Sch Transportat & Logist, TR-34320 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Munzur Univ, Dept Emergency Aid & Disaster Management, TR-62000 Tunceli, Turkiye
[3] Munzur Univ, Dept Engn Management, TR-62000 Tunceli, Turkiye
关键词
Occupational risk assessment; Best -worst method; Stratification; Bayesian network; CRITERIA; SAFETY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108283
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the production industry, harmony and good management of the workplace environment, production machinery/vehicles, and workers are necessary to carry out production by occupational health and safety (OHS) principles. Therefore, occupational risk assessment (ORA) is crucial for manufacturing-based industries. When deciding on the prioritization of risks in ORA, adding to the analysis "how the parameters defining the risk changes in possible different states in the future" positively affects the soundness of decision-making. Therefore, this study aims to develop a unique ORA model handling future changes in the importance levels of risk parameters in the risk assessment process. To this aim, the concept of stratification and the best-worst method (BWM) are used together to determine the importance weights of the risk parameters in the ORA. In addition, the Bayesian version of BWM considers more than one expert's evaluations without losing information. In a nutshell, an approach called stratified Bayesian BWM (SBBWM) that can be used for further studies has been introduced to the literature. The technique determines the priority scores of each hazard by technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution sorting (TOPSIS-Sort) method. Thus, while determining each hazard's priority score and order, the class of this risk has also been determined. The proposed approach evaluated thirty-six risks encountered in manufacturing, storage, handling, and laboratory processes of a flour production facility. Control measures to be taken for each risk were also determined. Methodologically, various scenario analyses and sensitivity studies were conducted to reveal how the results changed in different conditions. The proposed approach provides a more comprehensive procedure for production facilities than traditional methods and avoids the deficiencies of traditional methods.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MAXIMIZING MODEL OF OCCUPATIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    KALDOR, DR
    ZYTOWSKI, DG
    PERSONNEL AND GUIDANCE JOURNAL, 1969, 47 (08): : 781 - 788
  • [2] A BAYESIAN MODEL OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    Wibig, Tadeusz
    Karbowiak, Michal
    Jaszczyk, Michal
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND DECISIONS, 2016, 26 (01) : 95 - 110
  • [3] From science to decision-making: The applicability of Bayesian methods to risk assessment
    Hill, RA
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04): : 636 - 642
  • [4] Study on Industry Risk Assessment of Decision-making Model
    Mao Yuzhong
    Yang Guangming
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, : 325 - 329
  • [5] DECISION-MAKING STYLES AND PROGRESS IN OCCUPATIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    PHILLIPS, SD
    PAZIENZA, NJ
    WALSH, DJ
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1984, 25 (01) : 96 - 105
  • [6] Decision-Making Model under Risk Assessment Based on Entropy
    Dong, Xin
    Lu, Hao
    Xia, Yuanpu
    Xiong, Ziming
    ENTROPY, 2016, 18 (11)
  • [7] The shortfall of risk assessment for decision-making
    Hjorth, Rune
    NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 12 (12) : 1109 - 1110
  • [8] DECISION-MAKING AND PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    BARI, RA
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1986, 93 (2-3) : 341 - 348
  • [9] RISK ASSESSMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING
    STRAF, ML
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1982, 36 (03): : 222 - 224
  • [10] The shortfall of risk assessment for decision-making
    Rune Hjorth
    Nature Nanotechnology, 2017, 12 : 1109 - 1110