Impacts of conservation agriculture on crop yield and soil carbon sequestration: a meta-analysis in the Indian subcontinent

被引:0
|
作者
Padbhushan, Rajeev [1 ]
Kumar, Upendra [2 ]
Sinha, Abhas Kumar [3 ]
Datta, Ashim [4 ]
Mondal, Surajit [5 ]
Rana, D. S. [6 ]
Mitra, Biplab [3 ]
Bhattacharya, Prateek M. [3 ]
Kaviraj, Megha [2 ]
Kumar, Rajkishore [1 ]
Bijay-Singh [7 ]
机构
[1] Bihar Agr Univ, Dept Soil Sci & Agr Chem, Bhagalpur 813210, India
[2] ICAR Natl Rice Res Inst, Cuttack 753006, Odisha, India
[3] Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Cooch Behar 736165, West Bengal, India
[4] ICAR Cent Soil Salin Res Inst, Karnal, Haryana, India
[5] ICAR Res Complex Eastern Reg, Patna 800014, Bihar, India
[6] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr India Off, NASC Complex, New Delhi 110012, India
[7] Punjab Agr Univ, Ludhiana 141004, India
关键词
Tillage; Crop yield; Soil organic carbon; Soil texture; Meta-analysis; India; ORGANIC-MATTER; TILLAGE SYSTEMS; RESIDUE; STABILIZATION; WATER; MINERALIZATION; DYNAMICS; QUALITY; SOUTH; ROOT;
D O I
10.1007/s10653-024-02027-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the quest of achieving sustainable crop productivity, improved soil health, and increased carbon (C) sequestration in the soil, conservation agriculture (CA) is increasingly being promoted and adopted in the Indian subcontinent. However, because some researchers from different regions of the world have reported reduced crop yield under CA relative to agriculture based on conventional tillage (CT), a meta-analysis has been conducted based on published research from India to evaluate the effects of CA on the yield of crops, accumulation of soil organic C as an index of soil health, and C sequestration in the soil in different regions and soil textural groups in the country. The meta-analysis is based on 544 paired observations under CA and CT from 35 publications from India was carried out using Meta Win 2.1 software. The results showed an overall significant (p < 0.05) reduction of 1.15% crop yield under CA compared to CT. Yearwise data showed a reduction of yields under CA from 2009 to 2016, but an increase from 2017 to 2020. Yield reduction was observed in the eastern, north-eastern, and southern regions of India but in western, northern, and north-western regions of the country, an increase was observed under CA rather than CT. Sandy loam and clayey soils exhibited higher crop yield under CA than under CT. Compared to CT, soil organic C content and soil C sequestration under CA increased by 8.9% and 7.3%, respectively. Also, in all the regions and soil textural groups both soil organic C accumulation and soil C sequestration were higher under CA than under CT. Factors such as rainfall, soil depth, available nitrogen (N), and total N significantly influenced the extent of yield increase/decrease and soil organic C accumulation under CA. Overall, results of the meta-analysis suggest that the promotion of CA in India will have to be location-specific taking into consideration the crops, soil attributes, and climatic conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis on carbon sequestration through Conservation Agriculture in Africa
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Emilio J.
    Veroz-Gonzalez, Oscar
    Conway, Gordon
    Moreno-Garcia, Manuel
    Kassam, Amir
    Mkomwag, Saidi
    Ordonez-Fernandez, Rafaela
    Trivino-Tarradas, Paula
    Carbonell-Bojollo, Rosa
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2019, 190 : 22 - 30
  • [2] Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture
    Sun, Wenjuan
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Yu, Lijun
    Yu, Lingfei
    Zhang, Wen
    Smith, Pete
    Fischer, Tony
    Huang, Yao
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (06) : 3325 - 3335
  • [3] Temperate Regenerative Agriculture practices increase soil carbon but not crop yield-a meta-analysis
    Jordon, Matthew W.
    Willis, Kathy J.
    Buerkner, Paul-Christian
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Smith, Pete
    Petrokofsky, Gillian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (09)
  • [4] Effect of conservation tillage on crop yield and soil organic carbon in Northeast China: A meta-analysis
    He, Cong
    Niu, Jia-Rui
    Xu, Cheng-Tang
    Han, Shou-Wei
    Bai, Wei
    Song, Qiu-Lai
    Dang, Yash Pal
    Zhang, Hai-Lin
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 38 (02) : 1146 - 1161
  • [5] Impacts of the components of conservation agriculture on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage: A global meta-analysis
    Bohoussou, Yves N'Dri
    Kou, Yi-Hong
    Yu, Wei-Bao
    Lin, Bai-jian
    Virk, Ahmad Latif
    Zhao, Xin
    Dang, Yash Pal
    Zhang, Hai-Lin
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 842
  • [6] Synergistic improvement of carbon sequestration and crop yield by organic material addition in saline soil: A global meta-analysis
    Li, Siping
    Zhao, Lei
    Wang, Chong
    Huang, Huiying
    Zhuang, Minghao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 891
  • [7] Manure and Mineral Fertilizer Effects on Crop Yield and Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Meta-Analysis and Modeling Across China
    Jiang, Guiying
    Zhang, Wenju
    Xu, Minggang
    Kuzyakov, Yakov
    Zhang, Xubo
    Wang, Jinzhou
    Di, Jiaying
    Murphy, Daniel, V
    [J]. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2018, 32 (11) : 1659 - 1672
  • [8] Carbon sequestration potential through conservation agriculture in Africa has been largely overestimated Comment on: "Meta-analysis on carbon sequestration through conservation agriculture in Africa"
    Corbeels, Marc
    Cardinael, Remi
    Powlson, David
    Chikowo, Regis
    Gerard, Bruno
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2020, 196
  • [9] Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate-smart agriculture practices: A meta-analysis
    Bai, Xiongxiong
    Huang, Yawen
    Ren, Wei
    Coyne, Mark
    Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre
    Tao, Bo
    Hui, Dafeng
    Yang, Jian
    Matocha, Chris
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (08) : 2591 - 2606
  • [10] Impacts of honeybee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis
    Rollin, Orianne
    Garibaldi, Lucas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (05) : 1152 - 1163