A modified constitutive model considering the buckling behavior of longitudinal reinforcement in RC columns

被引：0
|
作者：
Yang H. [1 ]
Geng N.-F. [2 ]
Liu Z.-S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing
[2] Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of ChinaMinistry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing
来源：
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2020年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词：
Buckling; Concrete column; Constitutive model; Finite element analysis; Longitudinal steel bar;
D O I：
10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.08.0465
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The buckling of longitudinal steel bars always accelerates the deterioration of post-peak strength capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns. The reliability of the finite element model of RC columns depends on reasonably considering the effect of buckling in the constitutive relationship of bars. The constitutive model of buckled bars proposed by Gomes et al. (G-A model) has explicit physical meaning. However, obvious errors exist in the two basic assumptions. Finite element calculation of cyclic loading tests on the buckling behavior of 24 steel bar specimens was carried out on the OpenSees platform by using fiber section-based plastic hinge nonlinear beam-column elements. Based on the results of the finite element analysis, the errors of the two basic assumptions in the G-A model are analyzed, namely the plastic bending moment Mp and the geometric relationship of ignoring the axial deformation of the member. A modified G-A model is established on the basis of the regression analysis. The results show that the stress distribution on the critical section of a buckled bar is quite different from the plastic bending moment assumption adopted in the G-A model. The errors in calculating the mid-span lateral displacement of buckled bars were introduced by ignoring the axial deformation. The simulation results of the G-A model is less effective. The modified G-A model corrects the plastic bending moment and geometric relationship, and the calculation accuracy isobviously improved. © 2020, Engineering Mechanics Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：174 / 185
页数：11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Pantazopoulou S J., Detailing for reinforcement stability in RC members, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 124, 6, pp. 623-632, (1998)
  • [2] Moyer M J, Kowalsky M J., Influence of tension strain on buckling of reinforcement in concrete columns, ACI Structural Journal, 100, 1, pp. 75-85, (2003)
  • [3] Sato Y C, Ko H B., Experimental investigation of conditions of lateral shear reinforcements in RC columns accompanied by buckling of longitudinal bars, Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 36, 12, pp. 1685-1699, (2007)
  • [4] Yang Hong, Zhang Luo, Zhang Heping, Experiments and nonlinear analysis on seismic behavior of RC columns considering buckling and fatigue damage of reinforcing steel bar, Journal of Building Structures, 34, 11, pp. 130-140, (2013)
  • [5] Bayrak O, Sheikh S A., Plastic hinge analysis, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 127, 9, pp. 1092-1100, (2001)
  • [6] Su Junsheng, Wang Junjie, Bai Zhizhou, Et al., Influence of reinforcement buckling on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns, Engineering Structures, 103, pp. 174-188, (2015)
  • [7] Monti G, Nuti C., Nonlinear cyclic behavior of reinforcing bars including buckling, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 118, 12, pp. 3268-3284, (1992)
  • [8] Rodriguez M E, Botero J C, Villa J., Cyclic stress- strain behavior of reinforcing steel including effect of buckling, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 125, 6, pp. 605-612, (1999)
  • [9] Bae S, Mieses A M, Bayrak O., Inelastic buckling of reinforcing bars, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 131, 2, pp. 314-321, (2005)
  • [10] Kashani M M, Crewe A J, Alexander N A., Nonlinear cyclic response of corrosion damaged reinforcing bar with the effect of buckling, Construction and Building Materials, 41, pp. 388-400, (2013)
123