The interface between breast conserving surgery with oncoplastic techniques and mastectomy: when to perform one or the other-a narrative review

被引:1
|
作者
Pardo-Garcia, Ricardo [1 ,3 ]
Montero-Fernandez, M. Angeles [2 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Univ Trust, Nottingham Breast Inst, Nottingham, England
[2] Manchester Univ Fdn Trust, Cellular Pathol, Manchester, England
[3] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Breast Inst, City Hosp Campus,Hucknall Rd, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
关键词
Conservative breast surgery; oncoplastic breast surgery; mastectomy; indications; contraindications; COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; AXILLARY DISSECTION; RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; LUMPECTOMY; THERAPY; RECONSTRUCTION; CONSERVATION; RADIOTHERAPY; MAMMAPLASTY;
D O I
10.21037/abs-21-35
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this review is to describe different oncoplastic surgery techniques and indications versus mastectomy. Background: Oncoplastic breast surgery has emerged in last 2 decades as an alternative to mastectomy. It refers to the resection of the breast tumour with clear margins followed by the reconstruction of the defect using surgical plastic techniques. Oncoplastic breast surgery allows women to keep their breast with tumours that otherwise would imply a mastectomy performed. The concept of oncoplastic breast surgery requires in one side a complete oncological surgical technique and in the other performing that surgery using plastic surgery techniques. If a breast symmetry is needed or demanded by the patient it should be performed in the same operation. Oncoplastic breast surgery is a safe oncological option, and it maintains the shape of the breast without the secondary effects of foreign bodies, re -do surgery and its complications. In oncoplastic breast surgery there are two different groups of techniques available to correct the defect created after the surgical excision of the tumour: volume displacement and volume replacement. In the volume displacement technique following the resection, the defect is filled with the rest of the available breast. In volume replacement technique, autologous flaps and tissue are dissected and transposed from a close or distant place. It requires special training program that must be facilitated to all breast surgeons. Mastectomy remains the main option for patients who wish their breast to be removed or for those when breast conserving surgery is not suitable. Methods: We have searched the most relevant publications in PubMed from 1981 up to date using the keywords. Conclusions: Oncoplastic breast surgery techniques have become the best new surgical options to treat breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Partial Mastectomy Reconstruction During Breast-conserving Surgery - Classification of Oncoplastic Techniques
    Kraemer, S.
    Malter, W.
    Roethlisberger, M.
    Ludwig, S.
    Mallmann, P.
    Rezai, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S219 - S219
  • [2] Evolution of breast conserving surgery-current implementation of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery: a literature review
    Torras, Ines
    Cebrecos, Isaac
    Castillo, Helena
    Mension, Eduard
    GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (03) : 412 - 425
  • [3] Shoulder function following oncoplastic breast conserving surgery-a narrative review
    Lautrup, Marianne Djernes
    Rindom, Mikkel Boersen
    Hauerslev, Katrine Rye
    GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (05) : 713 - 721
  • [4] Outcomes of Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Setting of Breast Conserving Surgery with Oncoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review
    Dahl, Victoria
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Narvaez-Rojas, Alexis Rafael
    Desai, Anshumi
    Ku, Gabriel De La Cruz
    Moller, Mecker
    Avisar, Eli
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S176 - S176
  • [5] Outcomes in volume replacement and volume displacement techniques in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: A systematic review
    Raufdeen, Fasna
    Murphy, Jessica
    Ahluwalia, Monish
    Coroneos, Christopher J.
    Thoma, Achilles
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (11): : 2846 - 2855
  • [6] Objective decision making between conventional and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: An aesthetic and functional prospective cohort study
    Pukancsik, D.
    Kelemen, P.
    Ujhelyi, M.
    Kovacs, E.
    Udvarhelyi, N.
    Meszaros, N.
    Kenessey, I.
    Kovacs, T.
    Kasler, M.
    Matrai, Z.
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (02): : 303 - 310
  • [7] Re-excision Rate after Partial Mastectomy in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery A Single-Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature
    Benjamin, Martin A.
    Sinnott, Catherine
    Bawa, Sheina
    Kaufman, David I.
    Guarino, Katie
    Addona, Tommaso
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 : S170 - S172
  • [8] ASO Visual Abstract: Comparing Costs-Does Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Confer a Cost Benefit When Compared with Mastectomy and Reconstruction?
    Millen, Janelle-Cheri
    Sibia, Udai
    Jackson, Katherine
    Stern, Stacey L.
    Orozco, Javier I. J.
    Fancher, Crystal E.
    Grumley, Janie
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 7472 - 7472
  • [9] Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y.
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Zafar, Shaista
    Laroiya, Ishita
    Iqbal, Javeria
    Tan, Melissa Ley Hui
    Shetty, Geeta
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2022, 42
  • [10] A cross-sectional study to investigate association between oncoplastic techniques and patient satisfaction who received breast-conserving surgery
    Mitsueda, Reiko
    Gen, Anri
    Fujiki, Yoshitaka
    Gondo, Naomi
    Sato, Mutsumi
    Kawano, Junko
    Kuninaka, Koichi
    Kanemitsu, Shuichi
    Teraoka, Megumi
    Matsuyama, Yoshito
    Baba, Shinichi
    Nomoto, Sugako
    Sloan, Robert
    Rai, Yoshiaki
    Sagara, Yoshiaki
    Sagara, Yasuaki
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)