Optimization of thermophysical properties of nanofluids using a hybrid procedure based on machine learning, multi-objective optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Tao [1 ]
Pasha, Anahita Manafi Khajeh [2 ]
Sajadi, S. Mohammad [3 ]
Jasim, Dheyaa J. [4 ]
Nasajpour-Esfahani, Navid [5 ]
Maleki, Hamid [6 ]
Salahshour, Soheil [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Baghaei, Sh. [6 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Beijing Key Lab Farmland Soil Pollut Prevent & Rem, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Periodont, Orumiyeh, Iran
[3] Cihan Univ Erbil, Dept Nutr, Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq
[4] Al Amarah Univ Coll, Dept Petr Engn, Maysan, Iraq
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[6] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[7] Istanbul Okan Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[8] Bahcesehir Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[9] Lebanese Amer Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Math, Beirut, Lebanon
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dynamic viscosity; Hybrid nanofluid; Machine learning; Multi -criteria decision -making; Multi -objective optimization; Thermal conductivity; THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; HEAT-TRANSFER; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR; DYNAMIC VISCOSITY; WATER; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PARTICLES; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.150059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rheological and thermal behavior of nanofluids in real-world scenarios is significantly affected by their thermophysical properties (TPPs). Therefore, optimizing TPPs can remarkably improve the performance of nanofluids. In this regard, in the present study, a hybrid strategy is proposed that combines machine learning (ML), multi-objective optimization (MOO), and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to select optimal parameters for water-based multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)-oxide hybrid nanofluids. In the first step, four critical TPPs, including density ratio (DR), viscosity ratio (VR), specific heat capacity ratio (SHCR), and thermal conductivity ratio (TCR), are modeled using two efficient ML techniques, the group method of data handling neural network (GMDH-NN) and combinatorial (COMBI) algorithm. In the next step, the superior models are subjected to a four-objective optimization by the well-known non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), which aims to minimize DR/VR and maximize SHCR/TCR. This study considers volume fraction (VF), oxide nanoparticle (NP) type, and system temperature as optimization variables. In the final step, two prominent MCDM techniques, TOPSIS and VIKOR, were used to identify the desirable optimal points from the Pareto fronts generated by the MOO algorithm. ML results reveal the COMBI algorithm's superior reliability in accurately modeling various TPPs. The pattern of Pareto fronts for all oxide-NPs indicated that over one-third of the optimal points have a VF > 1.5 %. On the other hand, the distribution of optimal points across different temperature ranges varied significantly depending on the type of oxide-NPs. For Al2O3-based nanofluid, around 90 % of the optimal points were within 40-50 degrees C. Conversely, for nanofluids containing CeO2 NPs, only approximately 24 % of the optimal points were found within the same temperature range. Considering diverse scenarios for weighting TPPs in the MCDM process implied that combining CeO2/ZnO oxide-NPs with MWCNTs in water-based nanofluids is highly effective across various real-world applications.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of thermophysical properties of nanofluids using a hybrid procedure based on machine learning, multi-objective optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making
    Zhang, Tao
    Manafi Khajeh Pasha, Anahita
    Mohammad Sajadi, S.
    Jasim, Dheyaa J.
    Nasajpour-Esfahani, Navid
    Maleki, Hamid
    Salahshour, Soheil
    Baghaei, Sh.
    [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 485
  • [2] Machine learning aided model predictive control with multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Tan, Wallace Gian Yion
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    Wu, Zhe
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 179
  • [3] Multi-objective Optimization of FDM Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Based Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Techniques
    Chinchanikar S.
    Shinde S.
    Shaikh A.
    Gaikwad V.
    Ambhore N.H.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 2024, 105 (01) : 49 - 63
  • [4] A novel insight into the design of perforated-finned heat sinks based on a hybrid procedure: Computational fluid dynamics, machine learning, multi-objective optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making
    Abdollahi, Seyyed Amirreza
    Alenezi, Anwur
    Alizadeh, As 'ad
    Jasim, Dheyaa J.
    Ahmed, Mohsen
    Fezaa, Laith H. A.
    Aich, Walid
    Ben Said, Lotfi
    Kolsi, Lioua
    Maleki, Hamid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2024, 155
  • [5] Elite Multi-Criteria Decision Making-Pareto Front Optimization in Multi-Objective Optimization
    Kesireddy, Adarsh
    Medrano, F. Antonio
    [J]. ALGORITHMS, 2024, 17 (05)
  • [6] Machine learning aided multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making: Framework and two applications in chemical engineering
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Li, Jie
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    Wu, Zhe
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 165
  • [7] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection
    Wu, Qun
    Liu, Xinwang
    Qin, Jindong
    Zhou, Ligang
    Mardani, Abbas
    Deveci, Muhammet
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 184
  • [8] Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Craft, David
    van Haveren, Rens
    Heijmen, Ben
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [9] Multi-Objective Optimization of High-Power Microwave Sources Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Multi-Objective Micro-Genetic Algorithm
    Yang, Wenjin
    Li, Yongdong
    Wang, Hongguang
    Jiang, Ming
    Cao, Meng
    Liu, Chunliang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2023, 70 (07) : 3892 - 3898
  • [10] Multi-objective cross-sectional shape and size optimization of S-rail using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method
    Xie, Chong
    Wang, Dengfeng
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 62 (06) : 3477 - 3492