Improved method of crop water stress index based on UAV remote sensing

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Zhitao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chang [1 ]
Jia, Jiangdong [1 ]
Huang, Jialiang [1 ]
Guo, Yuhong [1 ]
Zhang, Qiuyu [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling,712100, China
[2] Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Areas Subordinated to the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling,712100, China
关键词
Crops;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202210136
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Canopy temperature is one of the most important parameters to calculate the crop water stress index (CWSI). Among them, the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with thermal infrared remote sensing function have been widely used to extract the crop canopy temperature in recent years. The monitoring accuracy of crop water can be improved to accurately remove the soil background in the thermal infrared images. In this study, an improved method was proposed to monitor the CWSI using UVA remote sensing. The research object was firstly selected as the summer maize at the jointing stage. Four water treatments were then carried out: T1 (50% of the field capacity), T2 (65% of the field capacity), T3 (80% of the field capacity), and T4 (95%-100% of the field capacity). The spatial distribution of surface maize canopy temperature in the study area was extracted by the red green ratio index (RGRI) with the visible and thermal infrared images from UAVs. Specifically, the UAV images were selected as 5 days in 2020 and 7 days in 2021. The cumulative frequency was then analyzed for the canopy temperature on each thermal infrared image. Soil water content data at a depth of 40cm was also collected at the same time. Subsequently, two methods were proposed to improve the performance of CWSI. The accuracy was evaluated using the correlation between the CWSI and crop physiological indexes (Stomatal conductance, Gs; Net photosynthetic rate, Pn; and Transpiration rate, Tr) with the soil moisture content. Method 1, the canopy temperature was segmented using different statistical quantiles in the normal distribution. Some unreasonable values were then eliminated for the low and high temperature in the histogram of canopy temperature frequency. The commonly-used statistical quantiles were 93.32%, 84.13%, 69.15%, 61.79%, 50%, 38.21%, 30.85%, and 15.87%, respectively. The intervals 0.62% and 2.28% were used to eliminate the high temperature values on the right side of the frequency histogram, and then the CWSI (denoted as CWSITcF%) was calculated from the average canopy temperature over different statistical quantiles. The statistical quantiles with the best correlation with the crop physiological indexes were selected as the most sensitive canopy temperature interval. In Method 2, maize canopy data was divided into four parts: Interval Ⅰ, Tc arc arc ar >20; and Interval Ⅳ, 40carn). The results showed that: 1) The coefficients R2 of CWSIn and crop physiological indexes (Gs, Pn, Tr) calculated from 2020 and 2021 were 0.72, 0.52 and 0.62, and normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) were 23.96%, 24.06% and 25.60%. The accuracy of model fitting was higher than that of original CWSI (R2 were 0.73, 0.34, 0.46, nRMSE were 23.69%, 28.27%, 30.21%), but little different from CWSITcF% (R2 were 0.74, 0.54, 0.61, nRMSE were 22.87%, 23.74% and 25.61%) 2) The most sensitive canopy temperature range varied greatly between years (2020, 61.17%; 2021, 49.38%; and Two-year data, 83.51%), although the CWSITcF% was provided a higher accuracy of crop water stress. There was also some influence on the application of CWSITcF% in practice. The CWSIn presented a higher stability for the crop physiological indexes (The nRMSE between physiological indicators were 16.60%, 27.37% and 28.49% in 2020 and 21.60%, 18.95%, 22.64% in 2021). Therefore, the improved CWSIn can be expected to more accurately monitor the crop water stress under UAVs remote sensing, compared with the original. © 2023 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 77
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crop water stress detection based on UAV remote sensing systems
    Dong, Hao
    Dong, Jiahui
    Sun, Shikun
    Bai, Ting
    Zhao, Dongmei
    Yin, Yali
    Shen, Xin
    Wang, Yakun
    Zhang, Zhitao
    Wang, Yubao
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 303
  • [2] CIG based Stress Identification Method for Maize Crop using UAV based Remote Sensing
    Kumar, Ajay
    Taparia, Mahesh
    Rajalakshmi, P.
    Guo, Wei
    Naik, Balaji B.
    Marathi, Balram
    Desai, U. B.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE SENSORS APPLICATIONS SYMPOSIUM (SAS 2020), 2020,
  • [3] Estimation of crop water stress index and leaf area index based on remote sensing data
    Cetin, Mahmut
    Alsenjar, Omar
    Aksu, Hakan
    Golpinar, Muhammet Said
    Akgul, Mehmet Ali
    [J]. WATER SUPPLY, 2023, 23 (03) : 1390 - 1404
  • [4] A Crop water stress index based on Remote Sensing methods for monitoring drought in an Arid area
    Liu, Suyi
    Pan, Xin
    Yang, Yingbao
    Yuan, Jie
    Yang, Zi
    Wang, Zhanchuan
    Xie, Wenying
    Song, Hao
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2023, 14 (08) : 890 - 900
  • [5] An Improved ASTER Index for Remote Sensing of Crop Residue
    Serbin, Guy
    Hunt, E. Raymond, Jr.
    Daughtry, Craig S. T.
    McCarty, Gregory W.
    Doraiswamy, Paul C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 1 (04) : 971 - 991
  • [6] Mapping Maize Water Stress Based on UAV Multispectral Remote Sensing
    Zhang, Liyuan
    Zhang, Huihui
    Niu, Yaxiao
    Han, Wenting
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [7] Remote Sensing in Irrigated Crop Water Stress Assessment
    Er-Raki, Salah
    Chehbouni, Abdelghani
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [8] IDENTIFICATION OF WATER-STRESSED AREA IN MAIZE CROP USING UAV BASED REMOTE SENSING
    Kumar, A.
    Shreeshan, S.
    Tejasri, N.
    Rajalakshmi, P.
    Guo, W.
    Naik, B.
    Marathi, B.
    Desai, U. B.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INDIA GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (INGARSS), 2020, : 146 - 149
  • [9] UAV Remote Sensing Assessment of Crop Growth
    Dorbu, Freda Elikem
    Hashemi-Beni, Leila
    Karimoddini, Ali
    Shahbazi, Abolghasem
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 87 (12): : 891 - 899
  • [10] A Review of Crop Water Stress Assessment Using Remote Sensing
    Ahmad, Uzair
    Alvino, Arturo
    Marino, Stefano
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (20)