Combining backward-looking information and forward-looking information in portfolio optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Huang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Zhu W. [3 ]
Zhu S. [1 ]
Li D. [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Business, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou
[2] School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jishou University, Jishou
[3] Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, Shenzhen
[4] School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
来源
Zhu, Shushang (zhuss@mail.sysu.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Systems Engineering Society of China卷 / 41期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
backward-looking" information; forward-looking" information; Bayesian analysis; Portfolio;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2020-0900
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Under the framework of mean-variance analysis, investors need to estimate the mean vector and covariance matrix of asset returns to make investment decision. The most common estimation method is called "backward-looking" method since it relies only on historical data. However, it does not use the "forward-looking" information implied by the market variables, such as asset prices, and then cannot predict the future well. In this paper, we consider the general situation that market participants are consisting of informed investors and noise traders, and extract the "forward-looking" information on asset returns implied in the equilibrium market portfolio. By combining the historical "backward-looking" information with the market implied "forward-looking" information via Bayesian analysis, we propose a "combined" method for return prediction. The theoretical analysis show that the "combined" method can adaptively select more "forward-looking" information when the informed investor has a higher market share, a lower risk-averse degree, or the noise trader has a lower noise trading intensity; otherwise, it will use more "backward-looking" information. Both the simulation experiments and the empirical tests demonstrate that the "combined" model can provide more flexible and robust prediction on asset returns in portfolio management. © 2021, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 881
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Markowitz H., Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance, 7, 1, pp. 77-91, (1952)
  • [2] Morgan J P., RiskMetricsTM-Technical document, (1996)
  • [3] Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S., Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, Journal of Risk, 2, 3, pp. 1071-1074, (1999)
  • [4] Bo L, Zhao D P, Fang Y, Et al., Multi-period portfolio selection model based on investor's views, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 37, 8, pp. 2024-2032, (2017)
  • [5] Cui X T, Zhu S S, Sun X L, Et al., Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric value-at-risk, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 6, pp. 2124-2139, (2013)
  • [6] Lin Y, Liang Z, Lin Z X, Et al., Research on financial market portfolio optimization based on high-dimensional R-vine Copula, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 39, 12, pp. 3061-3072, (2019)
  • [7] Ge H, Li Z F., Time-consistent strategy for general multi-period mean-variance asset-liability management in a Markov market, Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 39, 10, pp. 1609-1631, (2019)
  • [8] Ge H, Li Z F., Equilibrium strategy for multi-period mean-variance asset-liability management with regime switching and a stochastic cash flow, Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 39, 12, pp. 1998-2024, (2019)
  • [9] Jobson J D, Korkie R., Estimation for markowitz efficient portfolios, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 371, pp. 544-554, (1980)
  • [10] Michaud R O., The markowitz optimization enigma: Is 'optimized' optimal?, Financial Analysts Journal, 45, 1, pp. 31-42, (1989)