A nontrivial interplay between triadic closure, preferential, and anti-preferential attachment: New insights from online data

被引:2
|
作者
Kozitsin, Ivan V. [1 ]
Gubanov, Alexander V. [2 ]
Sayfulin, Eduard R. [2 ]
Goiko, Vyacheslav L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Lab Act Syst, VA Trapeznikov Inst Control Sci, 65 Profsoyuznaya St, Moscow 117997, Russia
[2] Natl Res Tomsk State Univ, Ctr Appl Big Data Anal, 36 Lenina St, Tomsk 634050, Russia
来源
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Temporal networks; Preferential attachment; Anti-preferential attachment; Triadic closure; Social selection; Echo-chambers; COMPLEX NETWORKS; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; SELECTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100248
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents an analysis of a temporal network that describes the social connections of a large-scale (similar to 30,000) sample of online social network users, inhabitants of a fixed city. We tested how the main network formation determinants-transitivity, preferential attachment, and social selection-contribute to network evolution. We obtained that tie appearing and tie removing events are governed by different combinations of mechanisms: whereas the structure of the network is responsible for the formation of new ties, nodal nonstructural characteristics "decide" whether a tie will continue to exist. Next, our findings show that only one network formation mechanism, gender selectivity, has a significant impact on both tie appearing and tie removing processes. What is interesting, the effect of gender selectivity is most notable for low-degree vertices. Besides this, our analysis revealed that opinion selectivity appears to be a noticeable (but not very important) factor only in the case of tie removing, whereas its contribution to tie appearing is elusive. Our findings suggest that nodes' activity is a crucial factor of network evolution-the majority of tie removing events can be explained by the age-based activity mechanism. Finally, we report that transitivity and preferential attachment do govern network evolution. However, there are two important details: (i) their zone of influence is restricted primarily by tie appearing and (ii) the preferential attachment mechanism is replaced by the anti-preferential attachment rule if the number of common peers is greater than zero.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Assortativity and leadership emerge from anti-preferential attachment in heterogeneous networks
    I. Sendiña-Nadal
    M. M. Danziger
    Z. Wang
    S. Havlin
    S. Boccaletti
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [2] Assortativity and leadership emerge from anti-preferential attachment in heterogeneous networks
    Sendina-Nadal, I.
    Danziger, M. M.
    Wang, Z.
    Havlin, S.
    Boccaletti, S.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6