Classification of full waveform data for monochromatic airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on waveform morphological features

被引:0
|
作者
Li Y. [1 ]
Liu Z. [1 ]
Zhang J. [2 ]
Wu L. [1 ]
Ji X. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Academy of Earth Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun
[2] Academy of Urban Rail Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering and Technology, Shanghai
[3] State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan
[4] Technology Innovation Center for Ocean Telemetry, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
airborne LiDAR bathymetry; full waveform; waveform characteristics; waveform classification;
D O I
10.3788/IRLA20230096
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Monochromatic airborne LiDAR bathymetry becomes considerably favorable for topography and geomorphology detection over coastal area by means of its low cost, low load and high sampling rate. However, addressing the limitation of single wavelength to realize the accurate division of full waveform data independently from auxiliary sensor becomes the critical part of coordinate calculation. Given the existing literatures, there is a lack of systematic evaluation analysis and general conclusions for waveform classification contraposing to full waveform morphological features. Methods In view of the latest development of waveform features extraction, refined waveform categories (anomalies, over-fitted, land, sea surface and bathymetry waveforms), 24-dimensional waveform features are designed and calculated upon systematic analysis on morphological characteristics of different waveforms, and then their classification performance and optimal feature combination are evaluated and quantitatively analyzed utilizing random forest feature selection and classification model. Results and Discussions The results proved that the combination of 6-dimensional features (Fig.8-11), including deviation of amplitude between two adjacent points and oscillating main frequency, is the most effective in classifying five waveforms, with an overall classification accuracy of 98.55% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.982 0 (Fig.9-10, Fig.12, Tab.1). To verify the universality of the features, an additional experimental area was selected for validation and the overall accuracy of water and land classification was 96.81% (Fig.13). Conclusions To accurately identify waveforms, a systematic analysis was conducted to determine the morphological differences between different types of waveforms, and 24-dimensional feature parameters were extracted. After the optimal feature combination and classification performance evaluation, it was found that the 6-dimensional features of oscillating main frequency f, ratio of peak Rp, deviation of amplitude between two adjacent points ∆A, maximum intensity Wf-I, decay constant a, and first echo peak Fpk were highly effective in distinguishing these five types of waveforms, where 100% of the anomalies and over-fitted waveforms were extracted, strongly confirming the relevance and validity of the morphological features. After replacing the experimental area, the accuracy of the water and land classification reached 96.81%, proving that the features and methods used were adaptable and generalizable, and could meet the production requirements. The 2% decrease in waveform classification accuracy after changing the study area is mainly due to the varying equipment parameter settings and coverage feature categories in different experimental areas. Limited sample selection further compounds this issue. To maintain accuracy, the sample data can be appropriately supplemented according to the actual situation in the experimental area. Although the waveform morphology has been studied thoroughly, additional experimental evidence is necessary to ascertain the impact of intrinsic factors such as signal reception systems on the echoes. To this end, future research will focus on expanding the study's data and signal detection. © 2023 Chinese Society of Astronautics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Liu Yongming, Deng Ruru, Qin Yan, Et al., Data processing methods and applications of airborne LiDAR bathymetry, Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 6, pp. 982-995, (2017)
  • [2] Jian Chen, Jin Xianglong, Advances in and application of airborne laser bathymetry technology [J], Marine Science Bulletin, 6, pp. 75-82, (2002)
  • [3] Zhai Guojun, Wang Keping, Liu Yuhong, Technology of airborne laser bathymetry, Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 34, 2, pp. 72-75, (2014)
  • [4] Li Hongpeng, Li Guoyuan, Cai Zhijian, Et al., Full-waveform LiDAR echo decomposition method, Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 1, pp. 89-98, (2019)
  • [5] Liu Zhimin, Yang Anxiu, Yang Fanlin, Et al., The feasibility analysis for the airborne LiDAR bathymetry application in marine surveying and charting, Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 38, 4, pp. 43-47, (2018)
  • [6] Zhao Jianhu, Ouyang Yongzhong, Wang Aixue, Status and development tendency for seafloor terrain measurement technology [J], Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 46, 10, pp. 1786-1794, (2017)
  • [7] Hu Haiying, Hui Zhenyang, Li Na, Airborne LiDAR point cloud classification based on Multiple-entity eigenvector fusion, Chinese Journal of Lasers, 47, 8, (2020)
  • [8] Hu Tiancheng, Tao Bangyi, Mao Zhihua, Et al., Classification of sea and land waveform based on multi-channel ocean lidar, Chinese Journal of Lasers, 44, 6, (2017)
  • [9] Deng Qian, Wu Decheng, Kuang Zhiqiang, Et al., 532 nm/ 660 nm dual wavelength lidar for self-calibration of water vapor mixing ratio, Infrared and Laser Engineering, 47, 12, (2018)
  • [10] Ji X, Tang Q, Xu W, Et al., Island feature classification for single-wavelength airborne lidar bathymetry based on full-waveform parameters, Applied Optics, 60, 11, pp. 3055-3061, (2021)