Comparison of a coronary bypass surgery using a combination of both on-pump beating heart and cardioplegic arrest with conventional coronary bypass surgery using cardioplegic arrest on-pump

被引:0
|
作者
Sahin, Mehmet Ali [1 ]
Kuralay, Erkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Alife Hosp, Cardiovasc Surg Dept, Citipiti sokak 6 Angoraevleri Cayyolu Cankaya, TR-06810 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Coronary bypass; Beating heart; Multi-perfusion set; Low LVEF; COLD BLOOD CARDIOPLEGIA; CARDIAC TROPONIN-I; MYOCARDIAL PROTECTION; METABOLISM; ARTERIAL; LACTATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12055-024-01754-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Antegrade cardioplegia may cause maldistribution in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Surgically bypassing large epicardial vessels before the cross-clamp and then administering cardioplegia from both the aortic root and the anastomosed grafts significantly prevent maldistribution and provide better cardiac protection. Methods This study included 80 patients, all older than 70 years with an ejection fraction between 25 and 35%. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Distal anastomoses to some of large epicardial coronary arteries were performed before the cross-clamp was placed. Grafted veins were attached to multi-perfusion set ports. Then, cross-clamping was performed, and the multi-perfusion set was disconnected from the aortic cannula and attached to the cardioplegia route. Antegrade cardioplegia was administered to both the aortic root and saphenous vein grafts. After all distal anastomoses were completed, the cross-clamp was removed, and the multi-perfusion set was connected to the aortic cannula again. Conventional coronary bypass techniques were used in group 2 patients. Results Inotropic agents were administered in 12 patients in group 1 and 29 patients in group 2 (p < 0.001). The average troponin I value in coronary sinus blood was 1.05 +/- 0.8 ng/mL in group 1 and 3.12 +/- 0.7 ng/mL in group 2 (p < 0.001). The average lactate value in coronary sinus blood was 1.15 +/- 0.55 mmol/L in group 1 and 3.7 +/- 2.4 mmol/L in group 2 (p < 0.001). Six patients died in the early postoperative period in group 2 (p = 0.028). Conclusion The current technique considerably reduces cross-clamping time and allows better distribution of the cardioplegic solution, preserving myocardium. Reduced coronary sinus lactate and troponin I levels also indicate better myocardial protection.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 553
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronary artery bypass surgery for acute coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of on-pump cardioplegic arrest, off-pump, and on-pump beating heart strategies
    Hwang, Bridget
    Williams, Michael L.
    Tian, David H.
    Yan, Tristan D.
    Misfeld, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (12) : 5290 - 5299
  • [2] On-pump with beating heart or cardioplegic arrest for emergency conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass during off-pump coronary artery bypass
    Yu, Lei
    Gu, Tianxiang
    Shi, Enyi
    Wang, Chun
    Fang, Qin
    Zhang, Yuhai
    Lu, Chunmao
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2014, 34 (04) : 314 - 319
  • [3] Postoperative Renal Outcomes of On-Pump Beating-Heart versus Cardioplegic Arrest Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Chen, Shao-Wei
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Chu, Yen
    Wu, Victor Chien-Chia
    Lee, Cheng-Chia
    Chen, Dong-Yi
    Lin, Pyng-Ling
    Tsai, Feng-Chun
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 33 (05) : 542 - 550
  • [4] A Novel Hybrid Of On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Results Produces Significant Myocardial Injury Compared to Conventional Cardioplegic Arrest
    Pegg, Tammy J.
    Francis, Jane
    Karamitsos, Theodoros
    Maunsell, Zoe
    Yu, Ly-Mee
    Neubauer, Stefan
    Taggart, David
    Selvanayagam, Joseph B.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) : S646 - S646
  • [5] A Randomized Trial of On-Pump Beating Heart and Conventional Cardioplegic Arrest in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Markers
    Pegg, Tammy J.
    Selvanayagam, Joseph B.
    Francis, Jane M.
    Karamitsos, Theodoros D.
    Maunsell, Zoe
    Yu, Ly-Mee
    Neubauer, Stefan
    Taggart, David P.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (21) : 2130 - 2138
  • [6] Should we consider beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting over conventional cardioplegic arrest to improve postoperative outcomes in selected patients?
    Al Jaaly, Emad
    Chaudhry, Umar A. R.
    Harling, Leanne
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 20 (04) : 538 - 545
  • [7] On-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery
    Lytle, Bruce W.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (10) : 1108 - 1109
  • [8] On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery—Is it outdated?
    A Pandey
    OP Sharma
    A Sharda
    D Mittal
    G Gupta
    P Saxena
    B Panigrahi
    A Bhan
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, 22 (1) : 60 - 60
  • [9] Comparison of neurological outcomes in patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, on-pump beating heart coronary bypass, and off-pump coronary bypass
    Sabban, Mostafa A.
    Jalal, Anjum
    Bakir, Bakir M.
    Alshaer, Ahmad A.
    Abbas, Osama A.
    Abdal-Aal, Mohammed M.
    Awadallah, Yasser A.
    Al-Saddique, Ahmed A.
    Fouda, Mohammed A.
    NEUROSCIENCES, 2007, 12 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [10] On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for high risk patients
    Seguel S, Enrique
    Farias M, Juan
    Gonzalez L, Roberto
    Alarcon C, Emilio
    Stockins L, Aleck
    Cardenas M, Patricio
    REVISTA CHILENA DE CIRUGIA, 2011, 63 (01): : 15 - 20