Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Cognitive Problems and Strategies Assessment in Patients with Bipolar Disorder

被引:0
|
作者
Tirado-Duran, Elsa [1 ]
Jimenez-Rodriguez, Laura Ivonne [1 ]
Castaneda-Franco, Marisol [1 ]
Jimenez-Tirado, Mariana [2 ]
Twamley, Elizabeth W. [3 ]
Fresan-Orellana, Ana [4 ]
Yoldi-Negrete, Maria [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ramon Fuente Muniz Natl Inst Psychiat, Clin Serv Directorate, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Med Sur Hosp, Teaching Dept, Mexico City, Mexico
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Excellence Stress & Mental Hlth, La Jolla, CA USA
[4] Ramon Fuente Muniz Natl Inst Psychiat, Clin Res Directorate, Mexico City, Mexico
[5] Inst Nacl Psiquiatria Ramon Fuente Muniz, Calz Mexico Xochimilco 101, Mexico City 14370, Mexico
关键词
bipolar disorder; cognition; cognitive assessment; screening instrument; compensatory strategies; cognitive complaints; subjective cognition; RATING ASSESSMENT COBRA; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; COMPLAINTS; VALIDATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; IMPAIRMENT; PREDICTORS; ABILITIES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1177/01632787241253021
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Cognitive deficits play an important role in Bipolar Disorder (BPD). The Cognitive Problems and Strategies Assessment (CPSA) is a measure that evaluates the patient's perception of cognitive difficulties, and the spontaneous use of compensatory strategies and could thus have potential utility for clinical practice in patients with BPD. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of the Cognitive Problems and Strategies Assessment (CPSA) in Bipolar Disorder (BPD). Ninety-three BPD outpatients and 90 controls completed the Assessment of Problems with Thinking and Memory (APTM) questionnaire and the Assessment of Memory and Thinking Strategies (AMTS) questionnaire which constitute the CPSA, the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA), as a measure of convergent validity, and general sociodemographic data. Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Spearman's correlation coefficient and independent sample t tests were used for Internal consistency, Convergent validity and Discriminant validity. The APTM had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93 and the AMTS 0.90. The COBRA score and the APTM were significantly correlated. BPD patients exhibited higher scores on the APTM and lower scores on the AMTS than controls. The present instrument enriches the clinician's repertoire for rapid and inexpensive cognitive evaluation in BPD.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric Properties of Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment in Iranian Bipolar Patients
    Momeni, Fereshte
    Vatanparast, Amin
    Shahmohammadi, Maryam
    Alipour, Faeghe
    Alikhani, Rosa
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2023, 17 (02)
  • [2] Psychometric properties of the Korean version of Functioning Assessment Short Test in bipolar disorder
    Lim, Eun-Sung
    Kang, Hangoeunbi
    Bahk, Won-Myong
    Lee, Sang-Yeol
    Yoon, Bo-Hyun
    Kim, Moon-Doo
    Sung, Hyung-Mo
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2024, 93 : 156 - 156
  • [3] Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Functioning Assessment Short Test in Bipolar Disorder
    Kang, H.
    Yoon, B. -H.
    Yun, H.
    Jeong, Y.
    Song, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 66 : S85 - S85
  • [4] Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Functioning Assessment Short Test in Bipolar Disorder
    Kang, Hangoeunbi
    Yoon, Bo-Hyun
    Bahk, Won-Myong
    Woo, Young Sup
    Kim, Won
    Lee, Jonghun
    Sohn, InKi
    Park, Sung-Yong
    Jon, Duk-In
    Jung, Myung Hun
    Kim, Moon-Doo
    Jung, Young-Eun
    Sung, Hyung-Mo
    Park, Young-Min
    Lee, Jung Goo
    Lee, Sang-Yeol
    Jang, Seung-Ho
    Lim, Eun-Sung
    Shim, In Hee
    Lee, Kwanghun
    Jang, Sae-Heon
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 21 (01) : 188 - 196
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory
    Jaen, Irene
    Vidal-Arenas, Veronica
    Suso-Ribera, Carlos
    Pastor, M. Carmen
    Garcia-Palacios, Azucena
    [J]. CLINICA Y SALUD, 2024,
  • [6] Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder
    Zhang, Yong
    Long, Xingning
    Ma, Xiaojuan
    He, Qianqian
    Luo, Xingguang
    Bian, Yanhui
    Xi, Yuanyuan
    Sun, Xia
    Ng, Chee H.
    Vieta, Eduard
    Xiang, Yu-Tao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 238 : 156 - 160
  • [7] Psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison of the cognitive complaints in bipolar disorder rating assessment (COBRA) in Mexican patients with bipolar disorder
    Yoldi-Negrete, Maria
    Fresan-Orellana, Ana
    Martinez-Camarillo, Sara
    Ortega-Ortiz, Hiram
    Juarez Garcia, Francisco Lorenzo
    Castaneda-Franco, Marisol
    Tirado-Duran, Elsa
    Becerra-Palars, Claudia
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 269 : 536 - 541
  • [8] Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale for Bipolar Disorder
    Chen, Jing-Xu
    Yin, Lu
    Xu, Hai-Ting
    Zhang, Suo-Yuan
    Huang, Wen-Qian
    Li, Hong-Juan
    Li, Bin-Bin
    Yang, Ke-Bing
    Li, Qian
    Berk, Michael
    Su, Yun-Ai
    Su, Yun-Ai
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2021, 17 : 787 - 795
  • [9] Psychometric properties of the well-being index (WHO-5) spanish version in a sample of euthymic patients with bipolar disorder
    Bonnin, C. M.
    Yatham, L. N.
    Michalak, E. E.
    Martinez-Aran, A.
    Dhanoa, T.
    Torres, I.
    Santos-Pascual, C.
    Valls, E.
    Carvalho, A. F.
    Sanchez-Moreno, J.
    Valenti, M.
    Grande, I.
    Hidalgo-Mazzei, D.
    Vieta, E.
    Reinares, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 228 : 153 - 159
  • [10] Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale
    Fuste, Gideoni
    Gil, Maria Angeles
    Lopez-Sola, Clara
    Rosado, Silvia
    Bonillo, Albert
    Pailhez, Guillem
    Bulbena, Antoni
    Perez, Victor
    Fullana, Miguel A.
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 21