New Feature Selection Method for Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on DGA Data

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Feng J. [1 ]
Li D. [1 ,2 ]
Wang S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Information Science and Engineering College, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[2] State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Limited Company, Shenyang
来源
关键词
Data distribution; Fault diagnosis; Information mining; Integrated decision; Optimal feature;
D O I
10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2020.1282
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The online transformer fault diagnosis can realize the real-time monitoring of the transformer status and adopt proper prior intervening, a great significance for power grid. This deduces that the intelligent transformer fault diagnosis is a key part of the smart grid construction. The fault features derived from the online monitoring of the oil dissolved gas have become the information source of the intelligent diagnosis method, and the quality of the gas directly affects diagnostic effect. At present, there are many types of transformer fault features, and the intelligent algorithms are often used to select the features. However, each single feature selection method has its own characteristics in both feature numbers and diagnostic effects. To combine these advantages, a new selection method of transformer features is proposed here. Based on the IEC TC10 database and the public literature samples, the characteristics of those single feature selection methods are analyzed and a new feature fusion optimization method is introduced. Through the field sample verification, the feature ranking result based on the fusion method is more reasonable than the individual ranking of each algorithm, and the selected feature subsets used by the new method has obvious advantages than the single method and the traditional gas ratio method. © 2021, Power System Technology Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3324 / 3331
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] LIU Yunpeng, XU Ziqiang, HE Jiahui, Et al., Data augmentation method for power transformer fault diagnosis based on conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial network, Power System Technology, 44, 4, pp. 1505-1513, (2020)
  • [2] LIU Kezhen, GOU Jiaqi, LUO Zhao, Et al., Prediction of dissolved gas concentration in transformer oil based on PSO-LSTM model, Power System Technology, 44, 7, pp. 2778-2785, (2020)
  • [3] DUVAL M., Dissolved gas analysis: it can save your transformer, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, 5, 6, pp. 22-27, (1989)
  • [4] IEEE guide for the interpretation of gases generated in oil-immersed Transformers: IEEE Std C57. 104-2008, (2009)
  • [5] ROGERS R R., IEEE and IEC codes to interpret incipient faults in transformers, using gas in oil analysis, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, EI-13, 5, pp. 349-354, (1978)
  • [6] DUVAL M, DEPABLA A., Interpretation of gas-in-oil analysis using new IEC publication 60599 and IEC TC 10 databases, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, 17, 2, pp. 31-41, (2001)
  • [7] DAI J J, SONG H, SHENG G H, Et al., Dissolved gas analysis of insulating oil for power transformer fault diagnosis with deep belief network, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 24, 5, pp. 2828-2835, (2017)
  • [8] ZHANG Yiyi, JIAO Jian, WANG Ke, Et al., Power transformer fault diagnosis model based on support vector machine optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 38, 1, pp. 99-104, (2018)
  • [9] LI S B, WU G N, GAO B, Et al., Interpretation of DGA for transformer fault diagnosis with complementary SaE-ELM and arctangent transform, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 23, 1, pp. 586-595, (2016)
  • [10] FAIZ J, SOLEIMANI M., Assessment of computational intelligence and conventional dissolved gas analysis methods for transformer fault diagnosis, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 25, 5, pp. 1798-1806, (2018)