A systematic review of shared decision making training programs for general practitioners

被引:1
|
作者
Jaeken, Jasmien [1 ]
Billiouw, Cathoo [1 ]
Mertens, Lien [1 ]
Van Bostraeten, Pieter [1 ]
Bekkering, Geertruida [1 ]
Vermandere, Mieke [1 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [1 ]
van Mileghem, Laura [1 ]
Delvaux, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Dept PH&PC, Kapucijnenvoer 7 Block H,Box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Shared decision making; Decision making; Educational intervention; General practitioner; CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RISK COMMUNICATION AIDS; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; SKILL DEVELOPMENT; INVOLVE PATIENTS; PATIENT; INTERVENTIONS; COMPETENCES; INFECTIONS; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-05557-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) has been presented as the preferred approach for decisions where there is more than one acceptable option and has been identified a priority feature of high-quality patient-centered care. Considering the foundation of trust between general practitioners (GPs) and patients and the variety of diseases in primary care, the primary care context can be viewed as roots of SDM. GPs are requesting training programs to improve their SDM skills leading to a more patient-centered care approach. Because of the high number of training programs available, it is important to overview these training interventions specifically for primary care and to explore how these training programs are evaluated.Methods This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. Eight different databases were used in December 2022 and updated in September 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using ICROMS. Training effectiveness was analyzed using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model and categorized according to training format (online, live or blended learning).Results We identified 29 different SDM training programs for GPs. SDM training has a moderate impact on patient (SMD 0.53 95% CI 0.15-0.90) and observer reported SDM skills (SMD 0.59 95%CI 0.21-0.97). For blended training programs, we found a high impact for quality of life (SMD 1.20 95% CI -0.38-2.78) and patient reported SDM skills (SMD 2.89 95%CI -0.55-6.32).Conclusion SDM training improves patient and observer reported SDM skills in GPs. Blended learning as learning format for SDM appears to show better effects on learning outcomes than online or live learning formats. This suggests that teaching facilities designing SDM training may want to prioritize blended learning formats. More homogeneity in SDM measurement scales and evaluation approaches and direct comparisons of different types of educational formats are needed to develop the most appropriate and effective SDM training format.Trial registration PROSPERO: A systematic review of shared-decision making training programs in a primary care setting. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023393385 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023393385.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does training general practitioners result in more shared decision making during consultations
    Sanders, A. R. J.
    Bensing, J. M.
    Essed, M. A. L. U.
    Magnee, T.
    de Wit, N. J.
    Verhaak, P. F. M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (03) : 563 - 574
  • [2] Training undergraduate medical students in shared decision making: A systematic review
    Shrivastava, Saurabh RamBihariLal
    Shrivastava, Prateek Saurabh
    Bankar, Nandkishor
    Bandre, Gulshan
    Mishra, Vaishnavi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : 1033 - 1037
  • [3] Resource effects of training general practitioners in risk communication skills and shared decision making competences
    Cohen, D
    Longo, MF
    Hood, K
    Edwards, A
    Elwyn, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 10 (03) : 439 - 445
  • [4] Educational programs to teach shared decision making to medical trainees: A systematic review
    Ospina, Naykky Singh
    Toloza, Freddy J. K.
    Barrera, Francisco
    Bylund, Carma L.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Montori, Victor
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (06) : 1082 - 1094
  • [5] General practitioners' views on shared decision making: a qualitative analysis
    Stevenson, FA
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) : 291 - 293
  • [6] Strategies for implementing shared decision making in elective surgery by health care practitioners: A systematic review
    Pham, Clarabelle
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Munn, Zachary
    Gibb, Catherine
    Fitridge, Robert
    Maddern, Guy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (02) : 582 - 601
  • [7] General dental practitioners' perceptions of shared decision making: a qualitative study
    Hayer, Natasha
    Wassif, Hoda S.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 232 (04) : 227 - 231
  • [8] General dental practitioners' perceptions of shared decision making: a qualitative study
    Natasha Hayer
    Hoda S. Wassif
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2022, 232 : 227 - 231
  • [9] Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
    Nicola McCleary
    Craig R Ramsay
    Jill J Francis
    Marion K Campbell
    Julia Allan
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [10] Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
    McCleary, Nicola
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Francis, Jill J.
    Campbell, Marion K.
    Allan, Julia
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14