Recreational Ecosystem Services: Progress and Prospect

被引：0

作者：

Jian Y. ^{[1
]}

Xu K. ^{[1
]}

Wang Z. ^{[1
]}

Huang Z. ^{[1
]}

Ye T. ^{[1
]}

Jiang T. ^{[1
]}

Cheng K. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] College of Architecture and Landscape, Peking University, Beijing

来源：

Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis | 2023年 / 59卷 / 05期

关键词：

ecosystem cultural services; object quality assessment; supply and demand; trade-offs; value quantity assessment;

D O I：

10.13209/j.0479-8023.2023.038

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study reviews recreational ecosystem services from 2005 to 2020, focusing on the concepts and contents of recreational ecosystem services in China and abroad, organizing research methods, and summarizing research gaps and future perspectives. The results show that the concept of recreational ecosystem services is a general term that can encompass many previous tourism-related concepts, and is applicable to region-wide studies. Existing research on recreational ecosystem services focuses on three dimensions: “Supply: quality and value”, “Demand: recreationist preferences and demand forecasting”, and “Trade-offs: supply and demand, mathematics and interest subjects”. The current research results on “Supply” are abundant and involve multiple approaches, but the exploration of “Demand” and “Trade-offs” is insufficient, lacking a systematic and holistic conceptual and classification system. Therefore, based on the review, this study proposes to expand the connotation of recreational ecosystem services Value from the concept, expand the universality of related research from the object, deepen the formation mechanism from the content, strengthen the value measurement and the use of multi-source data from the method. Furthermore, the paper proposes to translate the theoretical research results into policy management measures and planning design tools in concrete practice, so as to guide sustainable development and promote the benefits of natural ecosystems. © 2023 Peking University. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：884 / 896

页数：12

共 41 条

[1] (1999)
[2] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Et al., The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, pp. 253-260, (1997)
[3] Ecosystems and human well-being: volume 2 scenarios: findings of the scenarios working group (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series), (2005)
[4] (2019)
[5] (2017)
[6] Pelletier M C, Heagney E, Kovac M., Valuing recreational services: a review of methods with application to New South Wales National Parks, Ecosystem Services, 50, (2021)
[7] (2021)
[8] Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB, (2010)
[9] Ouyang Z Y, Song C, Zheng H, Et al., Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 25, (2020)
[10] Wang Z F, Xu M, Miu Y L, Et al., Urban park comparisons based on their different services to human wellbeing derived from social media texts, Urban Forestry and Greening, 63, (2021)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →