Wind tunnel tests for soft flutter characteristics of double-deck truss girder

被引:0
|
作者
Wu B. [1 ,2 ]
Wang Q. [1 ,2 ]
Liao H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Bridge Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[2] Sichuan Provincial Key Lab of Wind Engineering, Chengdu
来源
关键词
Amplitude uniqueness; Double-deck truss girder; Flutter form; Soft flutter; Wind tunnel test;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.01.026
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The application requirements of double-deck truss girders increase in bridge engineering with increase in urban traffic volume, and studying their soft flutter characteristics is helpful for improving their wind-resistant design level. Here, Yangsi Port Yangtze Bridge in Wuhan was taken as the study object, and wind tunnel tests were conducted for its segment model to measure soft flutter characteristics of its girder model under different working conditions, and compare similarities and differences of soft flutter forms under conditions of different wind speeds. The test results showed that double-deck truss girder reveals obvious soft flutter characteristics in tests, its flutter amplitude increases with increase in wind speed; under different wind speeds and 0° wind attack angle, soft flutter forms all are eccentric torsional motion; under 3° and 5° wind attack angles, soft flutter forms initially reveal typical bending-torsional coupled motion, with increase in wind speed, phase difference of bending-torsional coupled motion gradually decreases; when wind speed increases up to a certain value, bending-torsional coupled motion phase difference is zero, coupled flutter transfers to eccentric torsional one; in process of wind speed continuously increasing or decreasing, or under a constant wind speed, vibration amplitude of soft flutter is independent of initial excitations and related to a unique reduced wind speed, there are no phenomena that the same reduced wind speed corresponds to different amplitudes, or different reduced wind speeds correspond to the same amplitude; the occurrence mechanism of double-deck truss girder's soft flutter is explained from the view point of aerodynamic damping varying with variation of both reduced wind speed and flutter amplitude. © 2020, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Scanlan R., Tomko J., Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 97, 6, pp. 1717-1737, (1971)
  • [2] Chen X., Kareem A., Revisiting multimode coupled bridge flutter: some new insights, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 132, 10, pp. 1115-1123, (2006)
  • [3] Chen X., Improved understanding of bimodal coupled bridge flutter based on closed form solutions, Journal of Structural Engineering, 133, 1, pp. 22-31, (2007)
  • [4] Chen X., Matsumoto M., Kareem A., Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126, 1, pp. 7-16, (2000)
  • [5] Amandolese X., Michelin S., Choquel M., Low speed flutter and limit cycle oscillations of a two-degree-of-freedom flat plate in a wind tunnel, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 43, 31, pp. 244-255, (2013)
  • [6] Xu F., Chen A., Flutter test and analysis for the Suramadu Bridge in Indonesia, China Civil Engineering Journal, 42, 1, pp. 35-40, (2009)
  • [7] Zhu L., Gao G., Influential factors of soft flutter phenomenon for typical bridge deck sections, Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 43, 9, pp. 1289-1294, (2015)
  • [8] Zhu L., Gao G., A nonlinear self-excited force model for soft flutter phenomenon of a twin side girder bridge section, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 35, 21, pp. 29-35, (2016)
  • [9] Zheng S., Guo J., Zhu J., Et al., Characteristics and suppression measures for soft flutter of main girder with ∏-shaped cross section, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 52, 3, pp. 458-465, (2017)
  • [10] Chen X., Kareem A., Identification of critical structural modes and flutter derivatives for predicting coupled bridge flutter, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96, pp. 1856-1870, (2008)