Real effect of anticorruption on acquisition premium: Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xin [1 ]
Pan, Ailing [2 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Sch Management, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
acquisition premium; anticorruption; political connections; resource allocation; POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY; CORRUPTION; MERGERS; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; CONNECTIONS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1111/ecpo.12285
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Anticorruption is a prevalent global phenomenon and has yielded many good results. This study empirically tests the real effect of China's anticorruption on corporate acquisition premiums and explores its mechanisms. We find that after the exposure of and crackdown on corrupt provincial officials, firms without political connections had lower mergers and acquisitions (M&A) premiums than those with political connections. Cross-sectional test results show that when firms are private or in areas with high marketization, the anticorruption event has a greater impact on their acquisition premiums. The channel test demonstrates that anticorruption reduces the value of political connections and improves the negotiation advantages of nonpolitically connected firms, enabling them to pay lower M&A premiums. Our findings indicate that anticorruption can create a considerably fair business environment. Moreover, we confirm the real effects of anticorruption on the distortion of resource allocation at the firm level. Finally, the results of this research have policy implications for the world's largest emerging market.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anticorruption and growth: Evidence from China
    Qu, Guangjun
    Sylwester, Kevin
    Wang, Feng
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 55 : 373 - 390
  • [2] Enforcement and Political Power in Anticorruption Evidence from China
    Li, Li
    Lien, Donald
    Wu, Yiping
    Zhao, Yang
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 98 : 133 - 147
  • [3] Anticorruption, Government Subsidies, and Innovation: Evidence from China
    Fang, Lily
    Lerner, Josh
    Wu, Chaopeng
    Zhang, Qi
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (08) : 4363 - 4388
  • [4] Evidence of the 'forward premium puzzle' from China
    Sun, Dong
    Liu, Yuanxin
    Zhou, Yun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & SYSTEM DYNAMICS, VOL 6, 2009, : 19 - 22
  • [5] Motivation and Acquisition Premium: Evidence from Chinese Shipping Industry
    Chen, Wen
    Cui, Yongmei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2019, : 447 - 454
  • [6] Does an anticorruption campaign deteriorate environmental quality? Evidence from China
    Li, Boying
    Hao, Yu
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 29 (01) : 67 - 94
  • [7] Urban scale and wage premium: evidence from China
    Peng, Shuhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2019, 24 (03) : 468 - 480
  • [8] The power of the market over government officials: Evidence from an anticorruption campaign in China
    Xu, Nianhang
    Li, Nian
    Xie, Rongrong
    Chan, Kam C.
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 51 (04) : 995 - 1030
  • [9] The heterogeneity of beauty premium in China: Evidence from CFPS
    Peng, Langchuan
    Wang, Xi
    Ying, Shanshan
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 90 : 386 - 396
  • [10] Capital Structure Premium in Multinational SOEs: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhang, Xun
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 20 (01) : 283 - 293