Appropriateness and imaging outcomes of ultrasound, CT, and MR in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis from an urban academic center

被引:2
|
作者
Francisco, Martina Zaguini [1 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [2 ]
Carlesso, Lucas [1 ]
Zanon, Matheus [3 ]
Eymael, Thales [3 ]
Lima, Jose Eduardo [2 ]
Watte, Guilherme [3 ]
Hochhegger, Bruno [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ciencias Saude Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[2] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[4] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Appropriateness criteria; Inappropriate imaging; Appropriate imaging; Emergency radiology; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; OVERUSE;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-024-02226-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the appropriateness and outcomes of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) orders in the ED. Methods We retrospectively reviewed consecutive US, CT, and MR orders for adult ED patients at a tertiary care urban academic center from January to March 2019. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) guidelines were primarily used to classify imaging orders as "appropriate" or "inappropriate". Two radiologists in consensus judged specific clinical scenarios that were unavailable in the ACRAC. Final imaging reports were compared with the initial clinical suspicion for imaging and categorized into "normal", "compatible with initial diagnosis", "alternative diagnosis", or "inconclusive". The sample was powered to show a prevalence of inappropriate orders of 30% with a margin of error of 5%. Results The rate of inappropriate orders was 59.4% for US, 29.1% for CT, and 33.3% for MR. The most commonly imaged systems for each modality were neuro (130/330) and gastrointestinal (95/330) for CT, genitourinary (132/330) and gastrointestinal (121/330) for US, neuro (273/330) and gastrointestinal (37/330) for MR. Compared to inappropriately ordered tests, the final reports of appropriate orders were nearly three times more likely to demonstrate findings compatible with the initial diagnosis for all modalities: US (45.5 vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001), CT (46.6 vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001), and MR (56.3 vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001). Inappropriate orders were more likely to show no abnormalities compared to appropriate orders: US (65.8 vs. 38.8%, p < 0.001), CT (62.5 vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001), and MR (61.8 vs. 38.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusion The prevalence of inappropriate imaging orders in the ED was 59.4% for US, 29.1% for CT, and 33.3% for MR. Appropriately ordered imaging was three times more likely to yield findings compatible with the initial diagnosis across all modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 372
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comments on, "Appropriateness and imaging outcomes of ultrasound, CT, and MR in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis from an urban academic center"
    Cooper, Gillian
    McGinnis, Patrick
    Lin, Yiting
    Pourmand, Ali
    Tran, Quincy K.
    [J]. EMERGENCY RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 625 - 626
  • [2] Suboptimal CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of outcomes in a large academic medical center
    Bates D.D.B.
    Tkacz J.N.
    LeBedis C.A.
    Holalkere N.
    [J]. Emergency Radiology, 2016, 23 (6) : 603 - 607
  • [3] Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Apropriateness and imaging outcomes of ultrasound, CT, and MR in the emergency department
    Francisco, Martina Zaguini
    Altmayer, Stephan
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    [J]. EMERGENCY RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (05) : 789 - 790
  • [4] Appropriateness of medication selection for older persons in an urban academic emergency department
    Chin, MH
    Wang, LC
    Jin, L
    Mulliken, R
    Walter, J
    Hayley, DC
    Karrison, TG
    Nerney, MP
    Miller, A
    Friedmann, PD
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (12) : 1232 - 1242
  • [5] Analysis of Downstream Revenue to an Academic Medical Center From the Emergency Department
    McGuire, T.
    Madsen, T.
    Barton, E.
    Hopkins, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S49 - S49
  • [6] Appropriateness of Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations in an Academic Emergency Department Observation Unit
    Glover, McKinley
    Gottumukkala, Ravi V.
    Sanchez, Yadiel
    Yun, Brian J.
    Benzer, Theodore I.
    White, Benjamin A.
    Prabhakar, Anand M.
    Raja, Ali S.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (03) : 467 - 473
  • [7] ANALYSIS AND OUTCOMES OF ABNORMAL ECGS IN A COHORT OF PATIENTS SEEN AT AN URBAN ACADEMIC PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Patel, Shilpa
    Greene, Elizabeth Anne
    Saidinejad, Mohsen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (03) : 623 - 623
  • [8] Imaging Outcomes of Emergency MR Imaging in Dizziness and Vertigo: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Happonen, Tatu
    Nyman, Mikko
    Ylikotila, Pauli
    Mattila, Kimmo
    Hirvonen, Jussi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [9] Impact of Comprehensive Heart Failure Program on Emergency Department Visits - Experience From Urban Academic Center
    Edwards, Michelle
    Valadri, Ravinder Reddy
    Wirth, Barbara
    Ogunniyi, Modele
    Rhodes, Barbara
    Knauss, Michael
    Onwuanyi, Anekwe E.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [10] Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Computed Tomography Imaging Utilization at an Academic Centre: An Analysis of Clinical Indications and Outcomes
    Seidel, Jason
    Bissell, Mary Beth
    Vatturi, Sannihita
    Hartery, Angus
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2019, 70 (01): : 13 - 22