Evaluation of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure predicted by AnyBody Modeling System during load reaching/handling activities and effects of the prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads

被引:3
|
作者
Daroudi, S. [1 ]
Arjmand, N. [1 ,3 ]
Mohseni, M. [1 ]
El -Rich, M. [2 ]
Parnianpour, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Khalifa Univ, Healthcare Engn Innovat Ctr, Dept Mech Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[3] Sharif Univ Technol, Tehran 111559567, Iran
关键词
Ground reaction force; Center of pressure; AnyBody Modeling System; Material handling activities; Spine loads; NEURAL-NETWORK; EQUATION; MOMENTS; TOOLS; BODY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111974
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Full-body and lower-extremity human musculoskeletal models require feet ground reaction forces (GRFs) and centers of pressure (CoPs) as inputs to predict muscle forces and joint loads. GRFs/CoPs are traditionally measured via floor-mounted forceplates that are usually restricted to research laboratories thus limiting their applicability in real occupational and clinical setups. Alternatively, GRFs/CoPs can be estimated via inverse dynamic approaches as also implemented in the Anybody Modeling System (AnyBody Technology, Aalborg, Denmark). The accuracy of Anybody in estimating GRFs/CoPs during load-handling/reaching activities and the effect of its prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads remain to be investigated. Twelve normal- and over-weight individuals performed total of 480 static load-handling/reaching activities while measuring (by forceplates) and predicting (by AnyBody) their GRFs/CoPs. Moreover, the effects of GRF/CoP prediction errors on the estimated spinal loads were evaluated by inputting measured or predicted GRFs/CoPs into subject-specific musculoskeletal models. Regardless of the subject groups (normal-weight or overweight) and tasks (load-reaching or load-handling), results indicated great agreements between the measured and predicted GRFs (normalized root-mean-squared error, nRMSEs < 14% and R-2 > 0.90) and between their model-estimated spinal loads (nRMSEs < 14% and R-2 > 0.83). These agreements were good but relatively less satisfactory for CoPs (nRMSEs < 17% and 0.57 < R-2 < 0.68). The only exception, requiring a more throughout investigation, was the situation when the ground-foot contact was significantly reduced during the activity. It appears that occupational/clinical investigations performed in real workstation/clinical setups with no access to forceplates may benefit from the AnyBody GRF/CoP prediction tools for a wide range of load-reaching/handling activities.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 1 条