Functional traits differ across an invasive tree species' native, introduced, and invasive populations

被引:0
|
作者
Gundale, Michael J. [1 ]
Lindberg, Lisa [1 ]
Fajardo, Alex [2 ,3 ]
Nunez, Martin A. [4 ,5 ]
Nilsson, Marie-Charlotte [1 ]
Kardol, Paul [1 ]
Moyano, Jaime [4 ]
Nuske, Susan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol & Management, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Talca, Inst Invest Interdisciplinaria I3, Vicerrectoria Acad, Campus Lircay, Talca 3460000, Chile
[3] Inst Ecol & Biodivers IEB, Las Palmeras 3425, Nunoa, Chile
[4] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Grp Ecol Invas, INIBIOMA UNComa, RA-8400 San Carlos De Bariloche, Argentina
[5] Univ Houston, Dept Biol & Biochem, Houston, TX 77204 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Founder effects; Home versus away; Lodgepole pine; Native versus exotic; Patagonia; Plant functional traits; Population bottle neck; GENETIC-VARIATION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; SOIL PROPERTIES; PINUS-CONTORTA; PLANT TRAITS; METAANALYSIS; PATAGONIA; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10530-024-03316-3
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
It is often speculated that non-native invasive species undergo rapid changes in their phenotypic properties (i.e., traits) that provide adaptive advantage in their new environment. However, few studies have directly compared traits of invasive non-native species with their native counterparts to reveal whether such phenotypic changes occur, and which stages of initial introduction and subsequent invasion contribute to these shifts. We studied trait variation of an invasive tree, Pinus contorta, which is native to northwestern North America and invasive in the Patagonia region of South America (i.e., Argentina and Chile). Commercial plantations of P. contorta were introduced extensively in Patagonia from the 1970s onward, from an unknown seed origin within the Pacific Northwest, USA, where three sub-species are found, including subsp. contorta, latifolia, and murrayana. We employed a home-versus-away study approach, where we compared mean growth, defense, and reproduction trait values, and mean within-stand trait variation (Coefficient of Variation, CV) of Patagonia plantations, with the three native sub-species. We further compared mean traits, and trait CVs between invasive P. contorta and the Patagonia plantations from which they escaped. Patagonia plantations shared the most similar mean trait values with subsp. latifolia and murrayana, suggesting possible source populations. However, both mean trait values and trait CVs of Patagonia plantations differed from all three native sub-species, indicating potential founder effects, population bottlenecks, and/or plastic responses to their new environment that occurred during or after introduction. We also found evidence for selective change during invasion; however, these differences did not suggest growth traits were prioritized over defense traits, which was inconsistent with hypotheses that invaders exhibit an evolutionary trade-off between defense traits and growth traits. Our study highlights that processes occurring both at first introduction and establishment, as well as the subsequent invasion phase can influence the phenotype of successful invaders.
引用
收藏
页码:2295 / 2311
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional traits of acquisitive invasive woody species differ from conservative invasive and native species
    Dyderski, Marcin K.
    Jagodzinski, Andrzej M.
    [J]. NEOBIOTA, 2019, (41) : 91 - 113
  • [2] Invasive species differ in key functional traits from native and non-invasive alien plant species
    Mathakutha, Rabia
    Steyn, Christien
    le Roux, Peter C.
    Blom, Izak J.
    Chown, Steven L.
    Daru, Barnabas H.
    Ripley, Brad S.
    Louw, Anche
    Greve, Michelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (05) : 994 - 1006
  • [3] Differential germination strategies of native and introduced populations of the invasive species Plantago virginica
    Xu, Xinyu
    Wolfe, Lorne
    Diez, Jeffrey
    Zheng, Yi
    Guo, Hui
    Hu, Shuijin
    [J]. NEOBIOTA, 2019, (43) : 101 - 118
  • [4] ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE INTRODUCED IMPATIENS SPECIES
    Ugoletti, Paola
    Stout, Jane C.
    Jones, Michael B.
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT-PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY, 2011, 111B (03) : 143 - 156
  • [5] Can an invasive species compensate for the loss of a declining native species? Functional similarity of native and introduced oysters
    Zwerschke, Nadescha
    Eagling, Lawrence
    Roberts, Dai
    O'Connor, Nessa
    [J]. MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 153 (153)
  • [6] Associations between a highly invasive species and native macrophytes differ across spatial scales
    Thomaz, Sidinei Magela
    Michelan, Thaisa Sala
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2011, 13 (08) : 1881 - 1891
  • [7] Associations between a highly invasive species and native macrophytes differ across spatial scales
    Sidinei Magela Thomaz
    Thaisa Sala Michelan
    [J]. Biological Invasions, 2011, 13 : 1881 - 1891
  • [8] Using native and invasive populations as surrogate 'species' to predict the potential for native and invasive populations to shift their range
    Molofsky, Jane
    Collins, A. Robin
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (06) : 505 - 516
  • [9] Variation in root traits and phenotypic plasticity between native and introduced populations of the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata
    Li, Yang-Ping
    Li, Wei-Tao
    Niu, Yan-Fen
    Feng, Yu-Long
    [J]. NEOBIOTA, 2024, 92 : 45 - 60
  • [10] Differences in cold hardiness between introduced populations of an invasive tree
    Park, Isaac
    DeWalt, Saara J.
    Siemann, Evan
    Rogers, William E.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2012, 14 (10) : 2029 - 2038